Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25922992›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

A simple biophysical model emulates budding yeast chromosome condensation.

Tammy M K Cheng, Sebastian Heeger, Raphaël A G Chaleil, Nik Matthews, Aengus Stewart, Jon Wright, Carmay Lim, Paul A Bates, Frank Uhlmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SMC complexes: Lifting the lid on loop extrusion.Current opinion in cell biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Three-dimensional loop extrusion.Biophysical journal · 2021
    Article
  13. Mitotic chromosomes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tammy M K ChengBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Sebastian HeegerChromosome Segregation Laboratory, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Raphaël A G ChaleilBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Nik MatthewsAdvanced Sequencing Facility, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Aengus StewartBioinformatics and Biostatistics Service, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Jon WrightGenomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Carmay LimInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Paul A BatesBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Frank UhlmannChromosome Segregation Laboratory, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitotic chromosomes were one of the first cell biological structures to be described, yet their molecular architecture remains poorly understood. We have devised a simple biophysical model of a 300 kb-long nucleosome chain, the size of a budding yeast chromosome, constrained by interactions between binding sites of the chromosomal condensin complex, a key component of interphase and mitotic chromosomes. Comparisons of computational and experimental (4C) interaction maps, and other biophysical features, allow us to predict a mode of condensin action. Stochastic condensin-mediated pairwise interactions along the nucleosome chain generate native-like chromosome features and recapitulate chromosome compaction and individualization during mitotic condensation. Higher order interactions between condensin binding sites explain the data less well. Our results suggest that basic assumptions about chromatin behavior go a long way to explain chromosome architecture and are able to generate a molecular model of what the inside of a chromosome is likely to look like.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyModels, BiologicalAdenosine TriphosphatasesBinding SitesChromosomes, FungalDNA-Binding ProteinsGene ExpressionInterphaseMathematical ComputingMitosisModels, MolecularMultiprotein ComplexesNucleosomesProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAdenosine Triphosphatasescondensin complexesDNA-Binding ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesNucleosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinschromosome architecturechromosomescomputational biologycondensingenesmitosisS. cerevisiaesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID25922992
PMCPMC4413874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.