Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25922792›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2015

Similarity thresholds used in DNA sequence assembly from short reads can reduce the comparability of population histories across species.

Michael G Harvey, Caroline Duffie Judy, Glenn F Seeholzer, James M Maley, Gary R Graves, Robb T Brumfield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Species delimitation in endangered groundwater salamanders: Implications for aquifer management and biodiversity conservation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael G HarveyMuseum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA ; Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA.
Caroline Duffie JudyMuseum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA ; Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA ; Department of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC-116, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution , Washington, D.C. , USA.
Glenn F SeeholzerMuseum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA ; Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA.
James M MaleyMuseum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA ; Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA ; Moore Laboratory of Zoology, Occidental College , Los Angeles, CA , USA.
Gary R GravesDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC-116, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution , Washington, D.C. , USA ; Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen Ø , Denmark.
Robb T BrumfieldMuseum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA ; Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA.
Houston Museum of Natural Science · USNational Museum of Natural History · USLouisiana State University · USOccidental College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparing inferences among datasets generated using short read sequencing may provide insight into the concerted impacts of divergence, gene flow and selection across organisms, but comparisons are complicated by biases introduced during dataset assembly. Sequence similarity thresholds allow the de novo assembly of short reads into clusters of alleles representing different loci, but the resulting datasets are sensitive to both the similarity threshold used and to the variation naturally present in the organism under study. Thresholds that require high sequence similarity among reads for assembly (stringent thresholds) as well as highly variable species may result in datasets in which divergent alleles are lost or divided into separate loci ('over-splitting'), whereas liberal thresholds increase the risk of paralogous loci being combined into a single locus ('under-splitting'). Comparisons among datasets or species are therefore potentially biased if different similarity thresholds are applied or if the species differ in levels of within-lineage genetic variation. We examine the impact of a range of similarity thresholds on assembly of empirical short read datasets from populations of four different non-model bird lineages (species or species pairs) with different levels of genetic divergence. We find that, in all species, stringent similarity thresholds result in fewer alleles per locus than more liberal thresholds, which appears to be the result of high levels of over-splitting. The frequency of putative under-splitting, conversely, is low at all thresholds. Inferred genetic distances between individuals, gene tree depths, and estimates of the ancestral mutation-scaled effective population size (θ) differ depending upon the similarity threshold applied. Relative differences in inferences across species differ even when the same threshold is applied, but may be dramatically different when datasets assembled under different thresholds are compared. These differences not only complicate comparisons across species, but also preclude the application of standard mutation rates for parameter calibration. We suggest some best practices for assembling short read data to maximize comparability, such as using more liberal thresholds and examining the impact of different thresholds on each dataset.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsBirdsNext-generation sequencingNon-model speciesPhylogeographyPopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID25922792
PMCPMC4411482
OpenAlexW2053854292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.