ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2015
Long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as bridge to heart transplantation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left ventricular assist devices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024Review
- Biventricular catheterization combined with pressure-volume loop monitoring provides insight into the dynamic effects of left ventricular assist devices ramp on right ventricular function.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Effect of left ventricular assist device on the hemodynamics of a patient-specific left heart.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Impact of tricuspid valve insufficiency on the performance of left ventricular assist devices.JTCVS open · 2020Article
- Approaches to improving exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular assist devices: an area requiring further investigation.Expert review of medical devices · 2019Review
- Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Initial In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Left Ventricular Assist Device.BioMed research international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HTx) is the treatment of choice for end-stage heart failure but the limited availability of heart's donors still represents a major issue. So long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been proposed as an alternative treatment option to assist patients scheduled on HTx waiting list bridging them for a variable time period to cardiac transplantation-the so-called bridge-to-transplantation (BTT) strategy. Nowadays approximately 90% of patients being considered for MCS receive a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). In fact, LVAD experienced several improvements in the last decade and the predominance of continuous-flow over pulsatile-flow technology has been evident since 2008. The aim of the present report is to give an overview of continuous-flow LVAD utilization in the specific setting of the BTT strategy taking into consideration the most representative articles of the scientific literature and focusing the attention on the evolution, clinical outcomes, relevant implications on the HTx strategy and future perspectives of the continuous-flow LVAD technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.