ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2015
Support for patients with celiac disease: A literature review.
Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Celiac disease poses significant risk in developing depression, anxiety, headache, epilepsy, panic disorder, dysthymia: A meta-analysis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Gliadin-Specific T-Cells Mobilized in the Peripheral Blood of Coeliac Patients by Short Oral Gluten Challenge: Clinical Applications.Nutrients · 2015Pooled it
- An integrated nutritional and performance monitoring framework for athletes with celiac disease: A structured narrative review.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Large Language Models in Providing Evidence-Based Patient Education for Celiac Disease: A Comparative Analysis.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Celiac Disease Course of Eritrean Asylum-Seeker Children Living in Israel Compared to Native Israeli Children.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
- The Strategies of Picture Books as a Mode of Health Communication for Young Children with Coeliac Disease.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bridging the Gap: Awareness, Knowledge, and Challenges of Living with Celiac Disease in Bulgaria.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Risk of cardiovascular events among celiac disease patients: A meta-analysis review.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Expression of MicroRNAs in Adults with Celiac Disease: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A gluten-free diet for endometriosis patients lacks evidence to recommend it.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Gluten-Free Diet and Other Celiac Disease Therapies: Current Understanding and Emerging Strategies.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Anxiety and Depression Among Adults and Children With Celiac Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Different Psychiatry Scales.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2024Review
- Gluten-free diet adherence in children with screening-detected celiac disease using a prospective birth cohort study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Diet associations in endometriosis: a critical narrative assessment with special reference to gluten.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- The gluten-free diet challenge in adults with coeliac disease: the Hellenic survey.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Quality of Diet of Patients with Coeliac Disease in Comparison to Healthy Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Diagnostic management of patients reporting symptoms after wheat ingestion.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Risk perception and knowledge of COVID-19 in patients with celiac disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Article
- Educational Intervention Improved Parental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) and Adherence of Patients with Celiac Disease to Gluten-Free Diet.International journal of food science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCeliac disease (CD) is a lifelong disorder. Patients are at increased risk of complications and comorbidity.
objectivesWe conducted a review of the literature on patient support and information in CD and aim to issue recommendations about patient information with regards to CD.
methodsDATA SOURCE: We searched PubMed for English-language articles published between 1900 and June 2014, containing terms related to costs, economics of CD, or education and CD. STUDY SELECTION: Papers deemed relevant by any of the participating authors were included in the study. DATA SYNTHESIS: No quantitative synthesis of data was performed. Instead we formulated a consensus view of the information that should be offered to all patients with CD.
resultsThere are few randomized clinical trials examining the effect of patient support in CD. Patients and their families receive information from many sources. It is important that health care personnel guide the patient through the plethora of facts and comments on the Internet. An understanding of CD is likely to improve dietary adherence. Patients should be educated about current knowledge about risk factors for CD, as well as the increased risk of complications. Patients should also be advised to avoid other health hazards, such as smoking. Many patients are eager to learn about future non-dietary treatments of CD. This review also comments on novel therapies but it is important to stress that no such treatment is available at present.
conclusionBased on mostly observational data, we suggest that patient support and information should be an integral part of the management of CD, and is likely to affect the outcome of CD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.