Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25922655›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2015

Abuse-deterrent formulations: transitioning the pharmaceutical market to improve public health and safety.

Kyle Simon, Stacey L Worthy, Michael C Barnes, Benjamin Tarbell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle SimonDirector of Policy and Advocacy. Center for Lawful Access and Abuse Deterrence, 1000 Potomac Street NW, Suite 150-A, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Stacey L WorthyDCBA Law & Policy, 1000 Potomac St., NW, Suite 150-A, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Michael C BarnesDCBA Law & Policy, 1000 Potomac St., NW, Suite 150-A, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Benjamin TarbellDCBA Law & Policy, 1000 Potomac St., NW, Suite 150-A, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article evaluates abuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs) as a method to reduce prescription drug abuse while ensuring access to vital medications for individuals with legitimate need; assesses the pros and cons of ADFs and the current state of ADF adoption in the market; and develops policy recommendations to transition the market to ADFs. Although abuse-deterrent technology is still in its nascent stages, ADFs have been proven to reduce prescription drug abuse and its consequences, and even an incremental reduction in abuse can have a significant impact on the nation by reducing the costly social, physical, mental, and public health problems resulting from abuse. Federal ADF policy does not reflect the urgency of the prescription drug abuse epidemic and does not go far enough toward changing the status quo. Policies must be implemented to encourage innovation and a market shift toward ADFs by ensuring any generic medication that references a branded ADF demonstrates that it does not have abuse-deterrent properties inferior to the branded ADF product. Policies must also require federal prescription drug benefit plans to cover ADFs to ensure consumers have access to such medications.

Indexed as

abuse-deterrent formulationcontrolled substancepharmaceuticalsprescription drug abusesubstance abusesubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID25922655
PMCPMC4406920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.