Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25922522›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2015

Sensory hair cell development and regeneration: similarities and differences.

Patrick J Atkinson, Elvis Huarcaya Najarro, Zahra N Sayyid, Alan G Cheng

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. EDNRB2 regulates fate, migration, and maturation of hair cell precursors in regenerating avian auditory epithelium explants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Metabolic Profiling of Cochlear Organoids Identifies α-Ketoglutarate and NADAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. NADPH Oxidase 3: Beyond the Inner Ear.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  19. Hair Cell Regeneration: From Animals to Humans.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick J AtkinsonDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Elvis Huarcaya NajarroDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Zahra N SayyidDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Alan G ChengDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA aglcheng@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
Pathways towards regenerating the mammalian cochleaR01DC013910 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHENG, ALAN GI-LUN · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
COCHLEAR MECHANICSR01DC001910 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RHODE, WILLIAM S. · 1993 to 2007
$1.4M
Regulation of Inner Ear Stem CellsK08DC011043 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHENG, ALAN GI-LUN · 2010 to 2014
$1.1M
Disruption of Wnt secretion via conditional deletion of Porcupine and Wntless in the developing mouse cochleaF32DC014623 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HUARCAYA NAJARRO, ELVIS · 2015 to 2017
$168k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC014623NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC011043NIDCD NIH HHS K08DC011043NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001910NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013910NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC01910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory hair cells are mechanoreceptors of the auditory and vestibular systems and are crucial for hearing and balance. In adult mammals, auditory hair cells are unable to regenerate, and damage to these cells results in permanent hearing loss. By contrast, hair cells in the chick cochlea and the zebrafish lateral line are able to regenerate, prompting studies into the signaling pathways, morphogen gradients and transcription factors that regulate hair cell development and regeneration in various species. Here, we review these findings and discuss how various signaling pathways and factors function to modulate sensory hair cell development and regeneration. By comparing and contrasting development and regeneration, we also highlight the utility and limitations of using defined developmental cues to drive mammalian hair cell regeneration.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAge FactorsAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell CycleCell DifferentiationCell LineageChick EmbryoEar, InnerHair Cells, AmpullaLateral Line SystemMechanoreceptorsMiceMorphogenesisRegenerationSpecies SpecificityAtoh1 protein, mouseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsAtoh1FGFNotchp27Kip1, Cdkn1bShhWnt

Identifiers

PMID25922522
PMCPMC4419275
OpenAlexW1997352132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.