Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25922296›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2015

Motivational and control mechanisms underlying adolescent cannabis use disorders: A prospective study.

Janna Cousijn, Patty van Benthem, Evelien van der Schee, Renske Spijkerman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Day-level shifts in social contexts during youth cannabis use treatment.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janna CousijnConsortium Individual Development, Departments of Developmental and Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; ADAPT-lab, Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.cousijn@gmail.com.
Patty van BenthemParnassia Addiction Research Center (PARC), Brijder Addiction Care, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Evelien van der ScheeParnassia Addiction Research Center (PARC), Brijder Addiction Care, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Renske SpijkermanParnassia Addiction Research Center (PARC), Brijder Addiction Care, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Parnassia Groep · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis use disorders (CUDs) are the most prevalent substance use disorders among adolescents in treatment. Yet, little is known about the neuropsychological mechanisms underlying adolescent CUDs. Studies in adult cannabis users suggest a significant role for cognitive control and cannabis-oriented motivational processes, such as attentional bias, approach bias, and craving in CUDs. The current 6-month prospective study investigated the relationships between attentional bias, approach bias, craving, cognitive control, and cannabis use in adolescent patients in treatment for a primary or secondary CUD. Moreover, we investigated if these motivational processes and cognitive control could predict treatment progression after 6 months. Adolescents with a CUD had an attentional but no approach bias towards cannabis. In contrast to adult findings on the role of attentional bias, approach bias and cognitive control, only cannabis craving significantly correlated with current cannabis use and predicted cannabis use-related problems and abstinence from cannabis 6 months later. These findings identify craving as a predictor of treatment outcome, thereby supporting an important role for craving in the course of adolescent cannabis use and dependence. This prospective study is among the first to investigate neuropsychological mechanisms underlying adolescent CUDs, warranting future longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAlcoholismAttentionCognitionCravingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMotivationProspective StudiesStroop TestSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAdolescenceApproach biasAttentional biasCannabis use disorderCognitive controlCravingTreatment progression

Identifiers

PMID25922296
PMCPMC6989823
OpenAlexW2046101862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.