Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25921813›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2015

SOX2 reprograms resident astrocytes into neural progenitors in the adult brain.

Wenze Niu, Tong Zang, Derek K Smith, Tou Yia Vue, Yuhua Zou, Robert Bachoo, Jane E Johnson, Chun-Li Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phosphorylation and DNA damage resolution coordinate SOX2-mediated reprogramming in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Timing neural development and regeneration.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Base editing ofeLife · 2024
    Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenze NiuDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Tong ZangDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Derek K SmithDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Tou Yia VueDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Yuhua ZouDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Robert BachooDepartment of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Jane E JohnsonDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Chun-Li ZhangDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. Electronic address: chun-li.zhang@utsouthwestern.edu.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

REGULATION OF THE NEURAL DETERMINATION GENE MASH1R01NS032817 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOHNSON, JANE E · 1995 to 2016
$5.8M
Reprogramming reactive glial cells into functional new neurons after SCIR01NS111776 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WU, WEI, ZHANG, CHUN-LI · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
In Vivo Reprogramming of Glial Fate for Spinal Cord RepairR01NS088095 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHANG, CHUN-LI · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Transcriptional Control of Adult Neural Stem CellsR01NS070981 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHANG, CHUN-LI · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS AG-NS-0753-11NINDS NIH HHS NS032817NINDS NIH HHS NS070981NINDS NIH HHS NS088095NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032817NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070981NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088095NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glial cells can be in vivo reprogrammed into functional neurons in the adult CNS; however, the process by which this reprogramming occurs is unclear. Here, we show that a distinct cellular sequence is involved in SOX2-driven in situ conversion of adult astrocytes to neurons. This includes ASCL1(+) neural progenitors and DCX(+) adult neuroblasts (iANBs) as intermediates. Importantly, ASCL1 is required, but not sufficient, for the robust generation of iANBs in the adult striatum. These progenitor-derived iANBs predominantly give rise to calretinin(+) interneurons when supplied with neurotrophic factors or the small-molecule valproic acid. Patch-clamp recordings from the induced neurons reveal subtype heterogeneity, though all are functionally mature, fire repetitive action potentials, and receive synaptic inputs. Together, these results show that SOX2-mediated in vivo reprogramming of astrocytes to neurons passes through proliferative intermediate progenitors, which may be exploited for regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsAstrocytesBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBrainCalbindin 2Doublecortin ProteinImmunohistochemistryInterneuronsMiceNeural Stem CellsNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesSOXB1 Transcription FactorsAscl1 protein, mouseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCalb2 protein, mouseCalbindin 2Dcx protein, mouseDoublecortin ProteinSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25921813
PMCPMC4437485
OpenAlexW1987171954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.