ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2015
Review and resolution of some nomenclatural issues regarding the genus Psoroptes (Acari: Psoroptidae), scab-mites of domestic and wild mammals.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular phylogeny of Psoroptes ovis isolated from ear canker in a domestic rabbit from South India.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Traceback of theInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021Article
- Evaluation of an Indirect ELISA Using Recombinant Arginine Kinase for Serodiagnosis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some classifications recognize a number of species in the scab-mite genus, Psoroptes, mites that are of considerable importance in livestock production and veterinary medicine. However, modern studies suggest that populations from some host species are not morphologically or genetically distinct, creating taxonomic confusion with older names, which treated mites from different hosts as separate species. We review the taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus and the two oldest binomens, most recently known as Psoroptes ovis and Psoroptes equi. Prior authors have attributed these names to various authorities, with most attributing both names to Hering (Nova Acta Phys-Med Acad Caesar Leopold-Carol Nat Curios 18(2):573-624, 1838). In particular, the priority between these names was recently a point of contention, with P. ovis being treated as junior synonym of P. equi. A review of all relevant nineteenth and twentieth century publications indicates, however, that these binomens should be cited as P. ovis (Viborg in Veterinair-Selskabets Skrifter 2:139-152, 1813) and P. equi (Raspail in Bull gener Theraput Med Chir 7:169-184, 1834), with the former having priority over the latter assuming their conspecificity. We also clarify attribution of the authorship and the type species of the genus Psoroptes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.