Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25920912›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2015

The epidemiology, microbiology and clinical impact of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in England, 2009-2012.

L Byrne, C Jenkins, N Launders, R Elson, G K Adak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predicting clinical outcome ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Increased detection of Shiga toxin-producingEpidemiology and infection · 2025
    Article
  6. Epidemiology of Shiga toxin-producingJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Detection and analysis of Shiga toxin producing and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in cattle from Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Transforming Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. The epidemiology of Shiga toxin-producingEpidemiology and infection · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L ByrnePublic Health England Department of Gastrointestinal,Emerging and Zoonotic Infections,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control,London,UK.
C JenkinsPublic Health England Gastrointestinal Bacteria Reference Unit,London,UK.
N LaundersPublic Health England Department of Gastrointestinal,Emerging and Zoonotic Infections,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control,London,UK.
R ElsonPublic Health England Department of Gastrointestinal,Emerging and Zoonotic Infections,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control,London,UK.
G K AdakPublic Health England Department of Gastrointestinal,Emerging and Zoonotic Infections,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control,London,UK.
Public Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2012 in England, a total of 3717 cases were reported with evidence of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) infection, and the crude incidence of STEC infection was 1·80/100 000 person-years. Incidence was highest in children aged 1-4 years (7·63/100 000 person-years). Females had a higher incidence of STEC than males [rate ratio (RR) 1·24, P < 0·001], and white ethnic groups had a higher incidence than non-white ethnic groups (RR 1·43, P < 0·001). Progression to haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) was more frequent in females and children. Non-O157 STEC strains were associated with higher hospitalization and HUS rates than O157 STEC strains. In STEC O157 cases, phage type (PT) 21/28, predominantly indigenously acquired, was also associated with more severe disease than other PTs, as were strains encoding stx2 genes. Incidence of STEC was over four times higher in people residing in rural areas than urban areas (RR 4·39, P < 0·001). Exposure to livestock and/or their faeces was reported twice as often in cases living in rural areas than urban areas (P < 0·001). Environmental/animal contact remains an important risk factor for STEC transmission and is a significant driver in the burden of sporadic STEC infection. The most commonly detected STEC serogroup in England was O157. However, a bias in testing methods results in an unquantifiable under-ascertainment of non-O157 STEC infections. Implementation of PCR-based diagnostic methods designed to detect all STEC, to address this diagnostic deficit, is therefore important.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolEnglandEscherichia coli InfectionsEthnicityFemaleFoodborne DiseasesGastroenteritisHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHospitalizationHumansEscherichia colifoodborne zoonosesgastrointestinal infectionsinfectious disease epidemiologyzoonotic foodborne diseases

Identifiers

PMID25920912
PMCPMC9150938
OpenAlexW2137725945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.