Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25919477›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2015

A safer alternative: Cannabis substitution as harm reduction.

Nicholas Lau, Paloma Sales, Sheigla Averill, Fiona Murphy, Sye-Ok Sato, Sheigla Murphy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas LauCentre for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis, San Francisco, USA.
Paloma SalesCentre for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis, San Francisco, USA.
Sheigla AverillCentre for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis, San Francisco, USA.
Fiona MurphyCentre for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis, San Francisco, USA.
Sye-Ok SatoCentre for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis, San Francisco, USA.
Sheigla MurphyCentre for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis, San Francisco, USA.
Institute for Scientific Analysis · US

Funding

The Times are Changing: A Qualitative Study of Older and Younger Marijuana UsersR01DA033814 · NIDA · SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS CORPORATION · PI MURPHY, SHEIGLA BRIGHID · 2013 to 2018
$3.1M
Macrophage subsets in resolution of alcohol-associated liver diseaseR01AA033841 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI STEVEN A WEINMAN · 2026 to 2026
$349k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA033841NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033814NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsSubstitution is operationalised as a conscious choice made by users to use one drug instead of, or in conjunction with another based on: perceived safety, level of addiction potential, effectiveness in relieving symptoms, access and level of acceptance. Harm reduction is a set of strategies that aim to minimise problems associated with drug use while recognising that for some users, abstinence may be neither a realistic nor a desirable goal. In this paper, we aim for deeper understandings of older adult cannabis users' beliefs and substitution practices as part of the harm reduction framework. DESIGN AND

methodsWe present selected findings from our qualitative study of Baby Boomer (born 1946-1964) marijuana users in the San Francisco Bay Area. Although the sample consisted of primary cannabis users, many had personal experience with other drugs throughout their lifetimes. Data collection consisted of an audio-recorded, semi-structured in-depth life history interview followed by a questionnaire and health survey. Qualitative interviews were analysed to discover users' harm reduction beliefs and cannabis substitution practices.

resultsStudy participants described using cannabis as a safer alternative for alcohol, illicit drugs and pharmaceuticals based on their perceptions of less adverse side effects, low-risk for addiction and greater effectiveness at relieving symptoms, such as chronic pain. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsCannabis substitution can be an effective harm reduction method for those who are unable or unwilling to stop using drugs completely. More research is needed on cannabis as a safer alternative.

Indexed as

AgedAttitude to HealthCannabisChronic PainFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMarijuana AbuseMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSan Franciscocannabisdrug substitutiondrug userharm reductionmarijuana

Identifiers

PMID25919477
PMCPMC10840418
OpenAlexW2165336608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.