Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25919225›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2015

Impacts of a farmers' market incentive programme on fruit and vegetable access, purchase and consumption.

Lauren Ew Olsho, Gayle Holmes Payne, Deborah Klein Walker, Sabrina Baronberg, Jan Jernigan, Alyson Abrami

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fruit and Vegetable Purchases in Farmer's Market Stands: Analysing Survey and Sales Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren Ew Olsho1US Health Division,Abt Associates Inc.,55 Wheeler Street,Cambridge,MA 02138,USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4503-9745
Gayle Holmes Payne2Division of Nutrition,Physical Activity and Obesity,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,GA,USA.
Deborah Klein Walker1US Health Division,Abt Associates Inc.,55 Wheeler Street,Cambridge,MA 02138,USA.
Sabrina Baronberg3Physical Activity and Nutrition Program,NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,New York,NY,USA.
Jan Jernigan2Division of Nutrition,Physical Activity and Obesity,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,GA,USA.
Alyson Abrami3Physical Activity and Nutrition Program,NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,New York,NY,USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study examines the impact of Health Bucks, a farmers' market incentive programme, on awareness of and access to farmers' markets, and fruit and vegetable purchase and consumption in low-income New York City neighbourhoods.

designThe evaluation used two primary data collection methods: (i) an on-site point-of-purchase survey of farmers' market shoppers; and (ii) a random-digit-dial telephone survey of residents in neighbourhoods where the programme operates. Additionally, we conducted a quasi-experimental analysis examining differential time trends in consumption before and after programme introduction using secondary Community Health Survey (CHS) data.

settingNew York City farmers' markets and communities. SUBJECTS: Farmers' market shoppers (n 2287) completing point-of-purchase surveys in a representative sample of New York City farmers' markets in 2010; residents (n 1025) completing random-digit-dial telephone survey interviews in 2010; and respondents (n 35 606) completing CHS interviews in 2002, 2004, 2008 and 2009.

resultsGreater Health Bucks exposure was associated with: (i) greater awareness of farmers' markets; (ii) increased frequency and amount of farmers' market purchases; and (iii) greater likelihood of a self-reported year-over-year increase in fruit and vegetable consumption. However, our CHS analysis did not detect impacts on consumption.

conclusionsWhile our study provides promising evidence that use of farmers' market incentives is associated with increased awareness and use of farmers' markets, additional research is needed to better understand impacts on fruit and vegetable consumption.

Indexed as

AgricultureDietFeeding BehaviorFood SupplyPovertyProgram EvaluationSmall BusinessAwarenessChoice BehaviorFarmersFemaleFood PreferencesFruitHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHealth SurveysAccessFarmers’ marketsFruits and vegetablesNutrition incentives

Identifiers

PMID25919225
PMCPMC10271283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.