Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25918981›Full record

ArticleInternational nursing review2015

Research lessons from implementing a national nursing workforce study.

T Brzostek, P Brzyski, M Kózka, A Squires, L Przewoźniak, M Cisek, K Gajda, T Gabryś, M Ogarek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International nursing review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

T BrzostekFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
P BrzyskiDepartment of Medical Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
M KózkaFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
A SquiresInternational Education, College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
L PrzewoźniakInstitute of Public Health, Health Promotion Department, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
M CisekFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
K GajdaInstitute of Public Health, Medical Information System Department, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
T GabryśFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
M OgarekFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

Research Facilitation CoreP30NR005043 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AIKEN, LINDA H · 2000 to 2010
$4.5M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR005043NINR NIH HHS P30NR05043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational nursing workforce studies are important for evidence-based policymaking to improve nursing human resources globally. Survey instrument translation and contextual adaptation along with level of experience of the research team are key factors that will influence study implementation and results in countries new to health workforce studies.

aimThis study's aim was to describe the pre-data collection instrument adaptation challenges when designing the first national nursing workforce study in Poland while participating in the Nurse Forecasting: Human Resources Planning in Nursing project.

methodsA descriptive analysis of the pre-data collection phase of the study. Instrument adaptation was conducted through a two-phase content validity indexing process and pilot testing from 2009 to September 2010 in preparation for primary study implementation in December 2010. Means of both content validation phases were compared with pilot study results to assess for significant patterns in the data.

resultsThe initial review demonstrated that the instrument had poor level of cross-cultural relevance and multiple translation issues. After revising the translation and re-evaluating using the same process, instrument scores improved significantly. Pilot study results showed floor and ceiling effects on relevance score correlations in each phase of the study. LIMITATIONS: The cross-cultural adaptation process was developed specifically for this study and is, therefore, new. It may require additional replication to further enhance the method.

conclusionsThe approach used by the Polish team helped identify potential problems early in the study. The critical step improved the rigour of the results and improved comparability for between countries analyses, conserving both money and resources. This approach is advised for cross-cultural adaptation of instruments to be used in national nursing workforce studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: Countries seeking to conduct national nursing workforce surveys to improve nursing human resources policies may find the insights provided by this paper useful to guide national level nursing workforce study implementation.

Indexed as

Research DesignCross-Cultural ComparisonData CollectionForecastingHumansNursesPilot ProjectsPolandYoung AdultContent Validity IndexingCross-Cultural Instrument ValidationHealth WorkforceHuman Resources for HealthNursesNursingPolandSurvey Research

Identifiers

PMID25918981
PMCPMC8006064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.