Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25918827›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2015

Structure-based predictions of activity cliffs.

Jarmila Husby, Giovanni Bottegoni, Irina Kufareva, Ruben Abagyan, Andrea Cavalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exposing the Limitations of Molecular Machine Learning with Activity Cliffs.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in exploring activity cliffs.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Matched Molecular Pair Analysis in Short: Algorithms, Applications and Limitations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jarmila Husby†Department of Drug Discovery and Development-Computation, IIT-Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.
Giovanni Bottegoni†Department of Drug Discovery and Development-Computation, IIT-Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.
Irina Kufareva‡Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California 92161, United States.
Ruben Abagyan‡Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California 92161, United States.
Andrea Cavalli†Department of Drug Discovery and Development-Computation, IIT-Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.

Funding

Project 3U54GM094618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STEVENS, RAYMOND C · 2010 to 2014
$17.1M
Structure, Dynamics and Activation Mechanisms of Chemokine ReceptorsU01GM094612 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHANCE, MARK R · 2010 to 2014
$4.5M
Macromolecular DockingR01GM071872 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ABAGYAN, RUBEN · 2004 to 2017
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071872NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM094612NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In drug discovery, it is generally accepted that neighboring molecules in a given descriptor's space display similar activities. However, even in regions that provide strong predictability, structurally similar molecules can occasionally display large differences in potency. In QSAR jargon, these discontinuities in the activity landscape are known as "activity cliffs". In this study, we assessed the reliability of ligand docking and virtual ligand screening schemes in predicting activity cliffs. We performed our calculations on a diverse, independently collected database of cliff-forming cocrystals. Starting from ideal situations, which allowed us to establish our baseline, we progressively moved toward simulating more realistic scenarios. Ensemble- and template-docking achieved a significant level of accuracy, suggesting that, despite the well-known limitations of empirical scoring schemes, activity cliffs can be accurately predicted by advanced structure-based methods.

Indexed as

Quantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, PharmaceuticalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalLigandsMolecular ConformationMolecular Docking SimulationLigands

Identifiers

PMID25918827
PMCPMC4553268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.