Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25918674›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2015

FIBT versus florbetaben and PiB: a preclinical comparison study with amyloid-PET in transgenic mice.

Behrooz H Yousefi, Boris von Reutern, Daniela Scherübl, André Manook, Markus Schwaiger, Timo Grimmer, Gjermund Henriksen, Stefan Förster, Alexander Drzezga, Hans-Jürgen Wester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Novel Tracers and Radionuclides in PET Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  8. Clinical Relevance of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Amyloid Imaging: Poised for Integration into Medical Practice.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Behrooz H YousefiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Walther-Meißner-Str. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Boris von ReuternDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany ; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Daniela ScherüblDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
André ManookDepartment of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Walther-Meißner-Str. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Markus SchwaigerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Timo GrimmerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Gjermund HenriksenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Stefan FörsterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Alexander DrzezgaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Hans-Jürgen WesterDepartment of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Walther-Meißner-Str. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decade, an increasing number of studies have been published on the use of amyloid-β (Aβ) PET imaging with different (18)F-radiopharmaceuticals for clinical characterization of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in different stages. However, distinct study cohorts and different quantification techniques allow only for an indirect comparison between the different tracers. Thus, the aim of this study was the direct intra-individual in vivo comparison of different Aβ-targeted radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging, including the newly developed agent [(18)F]FIBT.

methodsA small group of four animals of a well-characterized APP/PS1 transgenic (tg) mouse model of AD and gender-matched control (ctl) animals underwent a sequential and standardized PET imaging regimen for direct comparison of [(18)F]FIBT, [(18)F]florbetaben, and [(11)C]PiB. The quantitative PET imaging data were cross-validated with the cerebral Aβ plaque load as quantified ex vivo on histological sections.

resultsWe found that FIBT (2-(p-methylaminophenyl)-7-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethoxy)imidazo[2,1-b]benzothiazole) compares favorably to florbetaben as a high-contrasting PET radiopharmaceutical for imaging Aβ pathology. The excellent pharmacokinetics of FIBT in combination with its high-binding affinity towards Aβ resulted in feasible high-contrast imaging of Aβ with high global cortex to cerebellum standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) in 24-month-old tg mice (tg 1.68 ± 0.15 vs. ctl 0.95 ± 0.02). The SUVRs in transgenic versus control animals (SUVRtg/SUVRctl) for FIBT (1.78 ± 0.16) were similar to the ratios as observed in humans (SUVRAD/SUVRctl) for the established gold standard Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) (1.65 ± 0.41).

conclusionsThis head-to-head PET tracer comparison study in mice indicated the good imaging properties of [(18)F]FIBT, such as high initial brain uptake, fast clearance of the brain, and high binding affinity towards Aβ as directly compared to the established amyloid tracers. Moreover, the preclinical study design is recommendable for reliable assessment and comparison of novel radiopharmaceuticals.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseAPP/PS1 transgenic mouse animal model of ADAutoradiographyFIBTFlorbetabenIn vivo imagingIn vivo radiotracers rankingPiBSmall-animal PETβ-amyloid

Identifiers

PMID25918674
PMCPMC4402683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.