Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25918654›Full record

ArticleCase reports in neurological medicine2015

Resolution of internal carotid dissection with middle cerebral artery occlusion in pregnancy.

Nicole Ulrich, Amanda Johnson, Dominique Jodry, Chi Dola, Sheryl Martin-Schild, Ramy El Khoury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in neurological medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Secondary Headaches During Pregnancy: When to Worry.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole UlrichStroke Program, Department of Neurology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Amanda JohnsonSection of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-8139
Dominique JodryStroke Program, Department of Neurology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Chi DolaSection of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8995-5329
Sheryl Martin-SchildStroke Program, Department of Neurology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3168-3521
Ramy El KhouryStroke Program, Department of Neurology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0895-9091
Tulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a common cause of stroke in younger patients. While the incidence of stroke in pregnancy is increasing, CAD remains a rare cause of ischemic stroke in the pregnant population, with only 30 cases described in the literature, most in the postpartum period. Methods. The case of a pregnant patient at 18 weeks of gestation presenting with CAD and ischemic stroke following intercourse is discussed. Discussion. CAD results from an intimal tear in the carotid artery, allowing accumulation of blood in the vessel wall. Stroke results from embolization of thrombogenic material in the wall. Etiology includes minor trauma, connective tissue disorders, or anatomic variations of the carotid artery. Most patients present with headache and/or neck pain, while ischemic symptoms are seen in at least 50% of patients. In the pregnant population, imaging with MRI or MRA of the head and neck aids in diagnosis. Once the diagnosis is made, patients are treated with either anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications. The optimal treatment in both pregnant and nonpregnant patients has not been well-studied. Conclusion. CAD is an important diagnosis to consider in a pregnant patient with persistent headache, especially if neurological symptoms are present. Imaging should be quickly obtained so treatment can be initiated.

Identifiers

PMID25918654
PMCPMC4396910
OpenAlexW2053343970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.