Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25918484›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2015

Flipping the classroom to teach systematic reviews: the development of a continuing education course for librarians.

Marisa L Conte, Mark P MacEachern, Nandita S Mani, Whitney A Townsend, Judith E Smith, Chase Masters, Caitlin Kelley

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Flipping it online: re-imagining teaching search skills for knowledge syntheses.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2021
    Article
  3. Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marisa L Conte
Mark P MacEachern
Nandita S Mani
Whitney A Townsend
Judith E Smith
Chase Masters
Caitlin Kelley

Funding

PHS HHS HHSN-276-2011-00005C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe researchers used the flipped classroom model to develop and conduct a systematic review course for librarians.

settingThe research took place at an academic health sciences library.

methodA team of informationists developed and conducted a pilot course. Assessment informed changes to both course components; a second course addressed gaps in the pilot. MAIN

resultsBoth the pilot and subsequent course received positive reviews. Changes based on assessment data will inform future iterations.

conclusionThe flipped classroom model can be successful in developing and implementing a course that is well rated by students.

Indexed as

Education, ContinuingReview Literature as TopicCurriculumHumansLibrary Science

Identifiers

PMID25918484
PMCPMC4404857
OpenAlexW2329121285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.