Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25918393›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Metabolic and trophic interactions modulate methane production by Arctic peat microbiota in response to warming.

Alexander Tøsdal Tveit, Tim Urich, Peter Frenzel, Mette Marianne Svenning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander Tøsdal TveitDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway; alexander.t.tveit@uit.no mette.svenning@uit.no.
Tim UrichDepartment of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute, 1090, Vienna, Austria; and.
Peter FrenzelDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Mette Marianne SvenningDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway; alexander.t.tveit@uit.no mette.svenning@uit.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arctic permafrost soils store large amounts of soil organic carbon (SOC) that could be released into the atmosphere as methane (CH4) in a future warmer climate. How warming affects the complex microbial network decomposing SOC is not understood. We studied CH4 production of Arctic peat soil microbiota in anoxic microcosms over a temperature gradient from 1 to 30 °C, combining metatranscriptomic, metagenomic, and targeted metabolic profiling. The CH4 production rate at 4 °C was 25% of that at 25 °C and increased rapidly with temperature, driven by fast adaptations of microbial community structure, metabolic network of SOC decomposition, and trophic interactions. Below 7 °C, syntrophic propionate oxidation was the rate-limiting step for CH4 production; above this threshold temperature, polysaccharide hydrolysis became rate limiting. This change was associated with a shift within the functional guild for syntrophic propionate oxidation, with Firmicutes being replaced by Bacteroidetes. Correspondingly, there was a shift from the formate- and H2-using Methanobacteriales to Methanomicrobiales and from the acetotrophic Methanosarcinaceae to Methanosaetaceae. Methanogenesis from methylamines, probably stemming from degradation of bacterial cells, became more important with increasing temperature and corresponded with an increased relative abundance of predatory protists of the phylum Cercozoa. We concluded that Arctic peat microbiota responds rapidly to increased temperatures by modulating metabolic and trophic interactions so that CH4 is always highly produced: The microbial community adapts through taxonomic shifts, and cascade effects of substrate availability cause replacement of functional guilds and functional changes within taxa.

Indexed as

Global WarmingSoil MicrobiologyArchaeaArctic RegionsCarbonCarbon DioxideChromatography, GasChromatography, High Pressure LiquidEcosystemEnvironmentFermentationGene Expression ProfilingHydrogenHydrolysisLinear ModelsMethaneCarbonCarbon DioxideHydrogenMethanePolysaccharidesRNA, RibosomalSoilArctic peatmethanemicroorganismsSOC mineralizationtemperature

Identifiers

PMID25918393
PMCPMC4434766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.