Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25918335›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

Patient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practice.

Matthew J Ridd, Diana L Santos Ferreira, Alan A Montgomery, Chris Salisbury, William Hamilton

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Exploring the Intensity and Continuity of Hospital Care for Patients With Long Covid: Evidence From an English Urban Healthcare System.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Observational
  3. What potential cancer symptoms should we consider 'unexplained'?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Associations between general practice characteristics and chest X-ray rate: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Observational
  10. What mechanisms could link GP relational continuity to patient outcomes?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  11. CA125 test result, test-to-diagnosis interval, and stage in ovarian cancer at diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Associations between diagnostic activity and measures of patient experience in primary care: a cross-sectional ecological study of English general practices.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2015: strong messages for clinical care in all six research categories.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  17. Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Continuity of care is very important.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J RiddCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Diana L Santos FerreiraCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
William HamiltonUniversity of Exeter, Exeter.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C41384/A13266Department of Health CTF-01-12-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuity of care may affect the diagnostic process in cancer but there is little research.

aimTo estimate associations between patient-doctor continuity and time to diagnosis and referral of three common cancers. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective cohort study in general practices in England.

methodThis study used data from the General Practice Research Database for patients aged ≥40 years with a diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. Relevant cancer symptoms or signs were identified up to 12 months before diagnosis. Patient-doctor continuity (fraction-of-care index adjusted for number of consultations) was calculated up to 24 months before diagnosis. Time ratios (TRs) were estimated using accelerated failure time regression models.

resultsPatient-doctor continuity in the 24 months before diagnosis was associated with a slightly later diagnosis of colorectal (time ratio [TR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.01 to 1.02) but not breast (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.01) or lung cancer (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.00). Secondary analyses suggested that for colorectal and lung cancer, continuity of doctor before the index consultation was associated with a later diagnosis but continuity after the index consultation was associated with an earlier diagnosis, with no such effects for breast cancer. For all three cancers, most of the delay to diagnosis occurred after referral.

conclusionAny effect for patient-doctor continuity appears to be small. Future studies should compare investigations, referrals, and diagnoses in patients with and without cancer who present with possible cancer symptoms or signs; and focus on 'difficult to diagnose' types of cancer.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisElectronic Health RecordsPhysician-Patient RelationsAgedContinuity of Patient CareEnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMorbidityNeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective Studiescancercontinuity of carediagnosisgeneral practicepatient-doctor continuitysymptoms

Identifiers

PMID25918335
PMCPMC4408510
OpenAlexW1972312454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.