Following the mixed methods trail: some travel advice.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Practical mixed methods strategies used to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in community-based primary health care research.Family practice · 2019
   Review
2. Why and how to use mixed methods in primary health care research.Family practice · 2019
   Article
3. Investigating the meaning of 'good' or 'very good' patient evaluations of care in English general practice: a mixed methods study.BMJ open · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as