Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25918250›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2015

Dual targeting of HER1/EGFR and HER2 with cetuximab and trastuzumab in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure: results of the "THERAPY"phase 1-2 trial.

Eric Assenat, David Azria, Caroline Mollevi, Rosine Guimbaud, Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu, Denis Smith, Jean-Pierre Delord, Emmanuelle Samalin, Fabienne Portales, Christel Larbouret and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00923299 (Phase I-II Study Evaluating Combined Treatment of Cetuximab and Trastuzumab in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Progressing After Gemcitabine Based Chemotherapy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00923299 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Phase I-II Study Evaluating Combined Treatment of Cetuximab and Trastuzumab in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Progressing After Gemcitabine Based Chemotherapy.(THERAPY)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2008 to 2011Enrolled33ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmscetuximab, trastuzumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence, prognosis and predictive status of HER2 amplification in anti-EGFR-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Discovery of aminopyridine-containing spiro derivatives as EGFR mutations inhibitors.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Eric AssenatCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire (CHU) de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
David AzriaInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)-Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Caroline MolleviInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)-Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Rosine GuimbaudCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, TSA, Toulouse Cedex, France.
Nicole Tubiana-MathieuCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Limoges, Limoges Cedex, France.
Denis SmithCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, Talence Cedex, France.
Jean-Pierre DelordInstitut Claudius Régaud, Toulouse, France.
Emmanuelle SamalinInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)-Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Fabienne PortalesInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)-Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Christel LarbouretIRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Bruno RobertIRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Frédéric BibeauInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)-Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Pierre BleuseInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)-Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Evelyne CrapezInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)-Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Marc YchouCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire (CHU) de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
André PèlegrinIRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRInstitut Regional du Cancer de MontpellierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRInserm · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve treatment efficacy, we decided to simultaneously target HER1 and HER2 with trastuzumab and cetuximab. Following promising preclinical results, we conducted a phase 1-2 trial in advanced pancreatic cancer patients after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failure. In this single-arm, non-randomized, multicenter trial, patients received weekly cetuximab (400mg/m², then 250mg/m²). They were sequentially included in two trastuzumab dose levels: 3.0 or 4.0mg/kg, then 1.5 or 2.0mg/kg/weekly. Endpoints were the objective response rate, safety, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). During phase 1 (n=10 patients), toxicities were evenly distributed except for skin toxicities that frequently caused compliance issues. The higher dose level was defined as the trastuzumab recommended dose. During phase 2 (n=39 patients), toxicities were mainly cutaneous reactions and asthenia. No objective response was observed. Nine patients were stabilized but arrested treatment due to toxicity. Median PFS was 1.8 months (95%CI: 1.7-2.0 months) and median OS was 4.6 months (95%CI: 2.7-6.6 months). Both were positively correlated with skin toxicity severity (P=0.027 and P=0.001, respectively). Conventional phase 1 dose-escalation schedules are unsuitable for targeted therapies because most cutaneous toxicities are not considered dose-limiting toxicities. The compliance issues caused by skin toxicities were particularly detrimental because of the toxicity-response correlation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleGemcitabineHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsCetuximabDeoxycytidineEGFR protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsGemcitabineTrastuzumabantibody combinationcetuximabpancreatic cancerphase 1/2trastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID25918250
PMCPMC4494975
OpenAlexW1541202145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.