SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2015
Different Measures, Different Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Performance-Based versus Self-Reported Measures of Health Literacy and Numeracy.
Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Health Literacy in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Health Literacy Among University Students: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- The Role of Health Literacy in Diabetes Knowledge, Self-Care, and Glycemic Control: a Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Health literacy and vaccination: A systematic review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Pooled it
- Health Literacy and Women's Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2016Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of Health Literacy Measurement in U.S. Interventions: Trends, Tools, and Gaps.Health literacy research and practice · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Nurses' Intention and Behavior in Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.The journal of nursing research : JNR · 2026Article
- A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Communication Difficulties in Friedreich Ataxia: COMATAX.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Systematic Review of Health Literacy and Health Behavior in Adolescents Research.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Examining the Factor Structure of Objective Health Literacy and Numeracy Scales: Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Physical activity, social support and BMI among middle school students in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Structural Validation and Measurement Invariance of the HLS-Q12 Health Literacy Instrument in Finnish Adults: Comparing Traditional and Alignment Methods.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Cross-sectional analysis of sociodemographic factors associated with self-reported and knowledge-based health literacy in Korea using data from KNHANES 2023.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish HLS-COVID-Q22 Questionnaire for Measuring Health Literacy on COVID-19 in Peru.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding health knowledge failures: uncertainty versus misinformation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of sleep duration and stroke prevalence in China and the U.S. before and during COVID-19.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- [Measuring health literacy: methods and tools for assessing general health literacy in adults].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Review
- Exploring health literacy among Japanese and international university students in Japan: A comparative cross-sectional study.Journal of migration and health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth literacy (HL) and numeracy are measured by one of two methods: performance on objective tests or self-report of one's skills. Whether results from these methods differ in their relationship to health outcomes or use of health services is unknown.
methodsWe performed a systematic review to identify and evaluate articles that measured both performance-based and self-reported HL or numeracy and examined their relationship to health outcomes or health service use. To identify studies, we started with an AHRQ-funded systematic review of HL and health outcomes. We then looked for newer studies by searching MEDLINE from 1 February 2010 to 9 December 2014. We included English language studies meeting pre-specified criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed abstracts and studies for inclusion and graded study quality. One reviewer abstracted information from included studies while a second checked content for accuracy.
resultsWe identified four "fair" quality studies that met inclusion criteria for our review. Two studies measuring HL found no differences between performance-based and self-reported HL for association with self-reported outcomes (including diabetes, stroke, hypertension) or a physician-completed rheumatoid arthritis disease activity score. However, HL measures were differentially related to a patient-completed health assessment questionnaire and to a patient's ability to interpret their prescription medication name and dose from a medication bottle. Only one study measured numeracy and found no difference between performance-based and self-reported measures of numeracy and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization. However, in a moderator analysis from the same study, performance-based and self-reported numeracy were differentially related to CRC screening utilization when stratified by certain patient-provider communication behaviors (e.g., the chance to always ask questions and get the support that is needed). DISCUSSION: Most studies found no difference in the relationship between results of performance-based and self-reported measures and outcomes. However, we identified few studies using multiple instruments and/or objective outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.