ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2015
Sessile serrated adenomas versus conventional adenomas. Different polyps in different populations?
Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and Clinical Features of Sessile Serrated Polyps: A Systematic Review.Gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) behaviour is associated with a lower presence of colorectal adenomas and serrated polyps.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Self-reported Metabolic Risk Factor Associations with Adenomatous, Sessile Serrated, and Synchronous Adenomatous and Sessile Serrated Polyps.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Observational
- Helicobacter pylori is associated with increased risk of serrated colonic polyps: Analysis of serrated polyp risk factors.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to determine risk factors for the development of sessile serrated adenomas (SSA/Ps) as well as to study differences between groups with SSA/Ps and conventional adenomas (tubular, tubulovillus and villus) in the general population.
methodsOne hundred patients with normal colonoscopies, 27 patients with 53 SSA/Ps and 69 patients with 156 conventional adenomas were studied, epidemiological data were collected and calculations of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio were performed prior to endoscopy. A univariate and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed using Stata 9.0.
resultsSSA/Ps had a positive association with increasing age (p = 0.01), heavy smoking (≥20 packet years) (p = 0.001) and past history of polyps (p = 0.004) in comparison to normal population. SSA/Ps showed an inverse association with conventional adenomas for diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001) and arterial hypertension (p = 0.001). Meanwhile, female sex was positively associated with SSA/P development in comparison to conventional adenomas (p = 0.031).
conclusionsHeavy smoking as a significant risk factor for developing SSA/Ps was confirmed from this study. It also seemed that patients with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension developed conventional adenomas more frequently than SSA/Ps; on the contrary, females were at higher risk of developing SSA/Ps than conventional adenomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.