ArticleAbdominal imaging2015
Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy.
Article in Abdominal imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI determined prostate volume and the incidence of prostate cancer on MRI-fusion biopsy: a systemic review of reported data for the last 20 years.International urology and nephrology · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2022Pooled it
- MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Targeted Biopsy and Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Should Hypoechoic Lesions on Transrectal Ultrasound Be Sampled During Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy?Urology · 2017Trial
- The prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 performs equally for standard biopsy and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2017Trial
- Reproducibility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy: Multi-Institutional External Validation by a Propensity Score Matched Cohort.The Journal of urology · 2016Trial
- Predictors of Extraprostatic Extension in Patients with Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v 2.1: Overview and Critical Points].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023Review
- Integration of spatial information in convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of intraoperative transrectal ultrasound images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2019Article
- Incidental findings on multiparametric MRI performed for evaluation of prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2018Article
- Multimodality Image Fusion with PSMA PET/CT and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Focal Therapy for Primary Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer: A Planned Research Initiative.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2017Article
- Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.The Journal of urology · 2017Article
- Molecular imaging and fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate.Clinical and translational imaging · 2017Article
- Tumor contact with prostate capsule on magnetic resonance imaging: A potential biomarker for staging and prognosis.Urologic oncology · 2017Article
- Risk stratification of prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI, nomograms and biomarkers.Future oncology (London, England) · 2016Review
- Midline lesions of the prostate: role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy and implications in Gleason risk stratification.International urology and nephrology · 2016Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging - ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy outperforms standard approaches in detecting prostate cancer: A meta-analysis.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2016Article
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling.The Journal of urology · 2016Article
- Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2016Review
- The significance of anterior prostate lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men.Urologic oncology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe posterior subcapsular region of the prostate is often undersampled by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy. The close proximity of these lesions to the posterior capsular wall of the prostate makes them difficult to localize while increasing the need for early detection because of their increased risk for extracapsular extension. We retrospectively evaluated the multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) features of subcapsular prostate cancers to make radiologists more aware of this condition. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween January 2010 and July 2014, all patients referred for 3T mpMRI and subsequent MR-US Fusion-guided biopsy (FgBx) and systematic 12-core sextant biopsy (SBx) under an IRB approved protocol, were reviewed, and imaging confirmed subcapsular prostate cancers were identified. Subcapsular lesions were defined as thin lesions that were just inside the prostate capsule. Matching patient demographics and clinical findings including age, PSA, PSA density, whole prostate volume, history of prostate cancer, Gleason score, and clinical management were tabulated.
resultsOf 992 eligible patients, 33 patients had subcapsular lesions in the prostate detected by mpMRI. Mean age, PSA, and prostate volume in this group were 63 years (range: 52-76 years), 8.4 ng/mL (range: 1.22-65.20), and 53 mL (range: 12-125 mL), respectively. The combination biopsy (SBx + FgBx) confirmed prostate cancer in 24 of 33 patients (72.7%) and in 9 patients the biopsy was negative. Of the 24 cancers, 19 were confirmed on both FgBx and conventional biopsy; however, 5 cancers were only detected on FgBx. In 4 of the 19 patients in which both biopsy methods were positive, the FgBx yielded a higher Gleason score.
conclusionSubcapsular lesions on mpMRI are relatively infrequent but are usually malignant. Although the majority are confirmed on conventional 12-core biopsies, about 20% of these lesions require FgBx for diagnosis, and FgBx more accurately grades the lesions in another 20%. Thus, FgBx is of considerable benefit in confirming the diagnosis of subcapsular prostate cancer despite their proximity to the prostatic capsule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.