Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25916563›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2015

Florbetapir positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers.

Ann Hake, Paula T Trzepacz, Shufang Wang, Peng Yu, Michael Case, Helen Hochstetler, Michael M Witte, Elisabeth K Degenhardt, Robert A Dean, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ann HakeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Neurology Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: hakean@lilly.com.
Paula T TrzepaczEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Shufang WangEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Peng YuEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Michael CaseEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Helen HochstetlerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Michael M WitteEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Elisabeth K DegenhardtEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Health Physicians Group, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Robert A DeanEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the relationship between florbetapir-F18 positron emission tomography (FBP PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers.

methodsAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative-Grand Opportunity and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 (GO/2) healthy control (HC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia subjects with clinical measures and CSF collected ±90 days of FBP PET data were analyzed using correlation and logistic regression.

resultsIn HC and MCI subjects, FBP PET anterior and posterior cingulate and composite standard uptake value ratios correlated with CSF amyloid beta (Aβ1-42) and tau/Aβ1-42 ratios. Using logistic regression, Aβ1-42, total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau181P (p-tau), and FBP PET composite each differentiated HC versus AD. Aβ1-42 and t-tau distinguished MCI versus AD, without additional contribution by FBP PET. Total tau and p-tau added discriminative power to FBP PET when classifying HC versus AD.

conclusionBased on cross-sectional diagnostic groups, both amyloid and tau measures distinguish healthy from demented subjects. Longitudinal analyses are needed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAniline CompoundsBrainCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesEthylene GlycolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsPositron-Emission TomographyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Aniline CompoundsEthylene GlycolsflorbetapirPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAlzheimer's diseaseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeBiomarkersCerebrospinal fluidFlorbetapir positron emission tomographyMild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID25916563
PMCPMC4544658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.