Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2015
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in chronic noncancer pain.
Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07277907 (Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone in the Treatment of Slow Transit Constipation), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone in the Treatment of Slow Transit Constipation: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation Is Effective but Choice of Endpoints Affects the Therapeutic Gain.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Analysis of Nausea in Clinical Studies of Lubiprostone for the Treatment of Constipation Disorders.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Pooled it
- Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: A Clinical Guideline.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2017Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of multimodal analgesic techniques for preventing chronic postsurgery pain under different surgical categories: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- The effect of naloxone treatment on opioid-induced side effects: A meta-analysis of randomized and controlled trails.Medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- The Efficacy of Lubiprostone in Patients of Constipation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Expert Consensus Document: An Algorithm for the Care and Treatment of Patients with Constipation Based on Ultrasonographic Findings in the Rectum.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Factors associated with long-term efficacy of lubiprostone for chronic constipation.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2023Article
- Review
- Differences in efficacy and safety of lubiprostone used for idiopathic vs opioid-induced constipation: meta-analysis of East Asian and Western populations.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2020Review
- Discovery of Axelopran (TD-1211): A Peripherally Restricted μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2019Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety Profile of Prucalopride in Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.Cureus · 2019Review
- Eicosanoids in the gastrointestinal tract.British journal of pharmacology · 2019Review
- Opioid-induced constipation: a narrative review of therapeutic options in clinical management.The Korean journal of pain · 2019Article
- Clinical Overview and Considerations for the Management of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain.The Clinical journal of pain · 2019Review
- Pathophysiology and management of opioid-induced constipation: European expert consensus statement.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Review
- American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Medical Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation.Gastroenterology · 2019Review
- New developments in the treatment of opioid-induced gastrointestinal symptoms.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis multicenter, phase 3 trial evaluated oral lubiprostone for constipation associated with non-methadone opioids in patients with chronic noncancer-related pain.
methodsAdults with opioid-induced constipation (OIC; <3 spontaneous bowel movements [SBMs] per week) were randomized 1:1 to double-blind lubiprostone 24 μg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the overall SBM response rate. Responders had at least moderate response (≥1 SBM improvement over baseline frequency) in all treatment weeks with available observed data, as well as full response (≥3 SBMs per week) for at least 9 of the 12 treatment weeks.
resultsIn total, 431 patients were randomized; 212 each received lubiprostone and placebo, and 7 were not treated. Overall, the SBM response rate was significantly higher for patients treated with lubiprostone vs. placebo (27.1 vs. 18.9%, respectively; P=0.030). Overall mean change from baseline in SBM frequency was significantly greater with lubiprostone vs. placebo (3.2 vs. 2.4, respectively; P=0.001). The median time to first SBM was significantly shorter with lubiprostone vs. placebo (23.5 vs. 37.7 h, respectively; P=0.004). Compared with placebo, the patients treated with lubiprostone exhibited significant improvements in straining (P=0.004), stool consistency (P<0.001), and constipation severity (P=0.010). No significant differences were observed in quality-of-life measures or the use of rescue medication; however, the percentage of patients who used rescue medication was consistently lower in the lubiprostone group than in the placebo group at months 1 (34.9 vs. 37.7%), 2 (23.4 vs. 26.6%), and 3 (20.5 vs. 22.0%). Adverse events (AEs) >5% were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain (lubiprostone: 11.3, 9.9, 4.2, and 7.1%, respectively; placebo, 3.8, 4.7, 5.2, and 0%, respectively). None of the serious AEs (lubiprostone, 3.3%; placebo, 2.8%) were related to lubiprostone.
conclusionsLubiprostone significantly improved symptoms of OIC and was well tolerated in patients with chronic noncancer pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.