Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25915861›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Selected Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain Promotes EGFR-Independent Akt Activation in an Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88-Infected IPEC-J2 Cell Model.

Wei Zhang, Yao-Hong Zhu, Jin-Cai Yang, Gui-Yan Yang, Dong Zhou, Jiu-Feng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  4. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Effects of Compound Probiotics on Cecal Microbiota and Metabolome of Swine.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Persistence of the ProbioticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Nutrients · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Beneficial effect of probiotics onInnate immunity · 2020
    Article
  18. Veterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei ZhangDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yao-Hong ZhuDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Jin-Cai YangDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Gui-Yan YangDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Dong ZhouDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Jiu-Feng WangDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) are important intestinal pathogens that cause diarrhea in humans and animals. Although probiotic bacteria may protect against ETEC-induced enteric infections, the underlying mechanisms are unknown. In this study, porcine intestinal epithelial J2 cells (IPEC-J2) were pre-incubated with and without Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 and then exposed to F4+ ETEC. Increases in TLR4 and NOD2 mRNA expression were observed at 3 h after F4+ ETEC challenge, but these increases were attenuated by L. rhamnosus treatment. Expression of TLR2 and NOD1 mRNA was up-regulated in cells pre-treated with L. rhamnosus. Pre-treatment with L. rhamnosus counteracted F4+ ETEC-induced increases in TNF-α concentration. Increased PGE2. concentrations were observed in cells infected with F4+ ETEC and in cells treated with L. rhamnosus only. A decrease in phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was observed at 3 h after F4+ ETEC challenge in cells treated with L. rhamnosus. Pre-treatment with L. rhamnosus enhanced Akt phosphorylation and increased ZO-1 and occludin protein expression. Our findings suggest that L. rhamnosus protects intestinal epithelial cells from F4+ ETEC-induced damage, partly through the anti-inflammatory response involving synergism between TLR2 and NOD1. In addition, L. rhamnosus promotes EGFR-independent Akt activation, which may activate intestinal epithelial cells in response to bacterial infection, in turn increasing tight junction integrity and thus enhancing the barrier function and restricting pathogen invasion. Pre-incubation with L. rhamnosus was superior to co-incubation in reducing the adhesion of F4+ ETEC to IPEC-J2 cells and subsequently attenuating F4+ ETEC-induced mucin layer destruction and suppressing apoptosis. Our data indicate that a selected L. rhamnosus strain interacts with porcine intestinal epithelial cells to maintain the epithelial barrier and promote intestinal epithelial cell activation in response to bacterial infection, thus protecting cells from the deleterious effects of F4+ ETEC.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBacterial AdhesionBlotting, WesternCell LineEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEpidermal Growth FactorEscherichia coli InfectionsIntestinal MucosaLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusMucinsNod2 Signaling Adaptor ProteinOncogene Protein v-aktReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSwineToll-Like Receptor 4Epidermal Growth FactorMucinsNod2 Signaling Adaptor ProteinOncogene Protein v-aktToll-Like Receptor 4Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID25915861
PMCPMC4411159
OpenAlexW2066914296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.