ArticleBone marrow transplantation2015
Efficacy of plerixafor in children with malignant tumors failing to mobilize a sufficient number of hematopoietic progenitors with G-CSF.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of plerixafor in pediatric cancer patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell harvest for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant.Blood cell therapy · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model to guide the use of plerixafor in pediatric population.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Article
- Factors Modifying Outcome After MIBG Therapy in Children With Neuroblastoma-A National Retrospective Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobilization of suitable amounts of PBSCs with granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) can be difficult in children. We report the results of using plerixafor in pediatric patients who failed to mobilize progenitors with G-CSF-based regimens. Thirty-three patients, median age 9 years (range 1-18 years) and median weight 29 kg (range 10-85 kg) were enrolled into the study. After 4 days of G-CSF stimulation, the median CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood was 10.4 per μL (range 0.27-23.0 per μL). Plerixafor was administered subcutaneously (0.24 μg/kg in 30 patients and 0.3 μg/kg in 3 patients) 11-12 h before apheresis. At the time of apheresis, CD34+ cell counts increased to a median of 44.1 per μL (range 8.4-357.0 per μL), a median 4.4-fold increase. Two patients (6%) failed to mobilize. Thirty-one patients underwent apheresis and in 27 >2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight were collected after one procedure. In total, 31 of 33 patients mobilized successfully and the median number of cryopreserved CD34+ cells was 5.6 × 10(6) /kg body weight (2.7 × 10(6)-27.4 × 10(6)). Twenty-four patients underwent transplantation. Engraftment was achieved in all but one patient, who died on day +9 after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The median time of neutrophil and platelet recovery was day +12 and +16, respectively. Our study confirms that plerixafor has impressive efficacy and very modest toxicity in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25915808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.