Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25915586›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2015

Lineage fate of ductular reactions in liver injury and carcinogenesis.

Simone Jörs, Petia Jeliazkova, Marc Ringelhan, Julian Thalhammer, Stephanie Dürl, Jorge Ferrer, Maike Sander, Mathias Heikenwalder, Roland M Schmid, Jens T Siveke and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [The logic of survival in patients with acute liver failure].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Significance of CCNs in liver regeneration.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone Jörs
Petia Jeliazkova
Marc Ringelhan
Julian Thalhammer
Stephanie Dürl
Jorge Ferrer
Maike Sander
Mathias Heikenwalder
Roland M Schmid
Jens T Siveke
Fabian Geisler
Technical University of Munich · DEHeidelberg University · DEGerman Center for Infection Research · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEImperial College London · GBKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

Novel insights into nutrient-dependent regulation of beta cell proliferationR01DK078803 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SANDER, MAIKE · 2007 to 2022
$4.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK078803NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078803Wellcome Trust 101033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ductular reactions (DRs) are observed in virtually all forms of human liver disease; however, the histogenesis and function of DRs in liver injury are not entirely understood. It is widely believed that DRs contain bipotential liver progenitor cells (LPCs) that serve as an emergency cell pool to regenerate both cholangiocytes and hepatocytes and may eventually give rise to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we used a murine model that allows highly efficient and specific lineage labeling of the biliary compartment to analyze the histogenesis of DRs and their potential contribution to liver regeneration and carcinogenesis. In multiple experimental and genetic liver injury models, biliary cells were the predominant precursors of DRs but lacked substantial capacity to produce new hepatocytes, even when liver injuries were prolonged up to 12 months. Genetic modulation of NOTCH and/or WNT/β-catenin signaling within lineage-tagged DRs impaired DR expansion but failed to redirect DRs from biliary differentiation toward the hepatocyte lineage. Further, lineage-labeled DRs did not produce tumors in genetic and chemical HCC mouse models. In summary, we found no evidence in our system to support mouse biliary-derived DRs as an LPC pool to replenish hepatocytes in a quantitatively relevant way in injury or evidence that DRs give rise to HCCs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBile DuctsCarcinoma, HepatocellularHepatocytesHumansLiverLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalMaleMiceMice, TransgenicStem CellsWnt Signaling Pathway

Identifiers

PMID25915586
PMCPMC4497753
OpenAlexW2020627106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.