ReviewBiomolecular concepts2015
Stepping inside the realm of epigenetic modifiers.
Review in Biomolecular concepts, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repair and regeneration across the lifespan: an ontogenetic perspective.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- CpG Island Methylator Phenotype-A Hope for the Future or a Road to Nowhere?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Androgen-induced epigenetic modulations in the ovary.The Journal of endocrinology · 2021Review
- Androgens regulate ovarian gene expression by balancing Ezh2-Jmjd3 mediated H3K27me3 dynamics.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Zinc Metalloproteins in Epigenetics and Their Crosstalk.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Epigenetic Modifiers Affect the Bioactive Compounds Secreted by an Endophyte of the Tropical PlantMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Role of Histone Acetylation-/Methylation-Mediated Apoptotic Gene Regulation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to regulate gene expression in response to environmental alterations is vital for the endurance of all cells. However, unlike bacteria and unicellular organisms, cells of multicellular eukaryotes have developed this competency in a highly sophisticated manner, which ultimately allows for multiple lineages of differentiated cells. To maintain stability and generate progeny, differentiated cells must remain lineage-committed through numerous cell generations, and therefore their transcriptional modus operandi ought to be memorized and transmittable. To preserve the specialized characteristics of differentiated cells, it is crucial that transcriptional alterations that are triggered by specific external or intrinsic stimuli can last also after stimuli fading and propagate onto daughter cells. The unique composition of DNA and histones, and their ability to acquire a variety of epigenetic modifications, enables eukaryotic chromatin to assimilate cellular plasticity and molecular memory. The most well-studied types of epigenetic modifiers are covalently modifying DNA or histones, mostly in a reversible manner. Additional epigenetic mechanisms include histone variant replacement, energy-utilizing remodeling factors, and noncoding transcripts assembled with modifying complexes. Working with multifunctional complexes including transcription factors, epigenetic modifiers have the potential to dictate a variety of transcriptional programs underlying all cellular lineages, while utilizing in each the same source DNA as their substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.