ReviewCentral European journal of urology2015
Artificial urinary conduit construction using tissue engineering methods.
Review in Central European journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous micrografting improves regeneration of tissue-engineered urinary conduits in vivo.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Preliminary In Vitro Assessment of Decellularized Porcine Descending Aorta for Clinical Purposes.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Tissue engineering in reconstructive urology-The current status and critical insights to set future directions-critical review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- A tissue-engineered urinary conduit in a porcine urinary diversion model.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Concise Review: Tissue Engineering of Urinary Bladder; We Still Have a Long Way to Go?Stem cells translational medicine · 2017Review
- Vascularization Potential of Electrospun Poly(L-Lactide-co-Caprolactone) Scaffold: The Impact for Tissue Engineering.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Article
- Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2016Article
- Differentiate into urothelium and smooth muscle cells from adipose tissue-derived stem cells for ureter reconstruction in a rabbit model.American journal of translational research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIncontinent urinary diversion using an ileal conduit is the most popular method used by urologists after bladder cystectomy resulting from muscle invasive bladder cancer. The use of gastrointestinal tissue is related to a series of complications with the necessity of surgical procedure extension which increases the time of surgery. Regenerative medicine together with tissue engineering techniques gives hope for artificial urinary conduit construction de novo without affecting the ileum. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this review we analyzed history of urinary diversion together with current attempts in urinary conduit construction using tissue engineering methods. Based on literature and our own experience we presented future perspectives related to the artificial urinary conduit construction.
resultsA small number of papers in the field of tissue engineered urinary conduit construction indicates that this topic requires more attention. Three main factors can be distinguished to resolve this topic: proper scaffold construction along with proper regeneration of both the urothelium and smooth muscle layers.
conclusionsArtificial urinary conduit has a great chance to become the first commercially available product in urology constructed by regenerative medicine methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.