Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25914713›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

An improved protocol to study the plant cell wall proteome.

Bruno Printz, Raphaël Dos Santos Morais, Stefanie Wienkoop, Kjell Sergeant, Stanley Lutts, Jean-Francois Hausman, Jenny Renaut

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Cell Wall Proteome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Changes in the Proteome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bruno PrintzEnvironmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg ; Groupe de Recherche en Physiologie Végétale, Earth and Life Institute Agronomy, Universiteì catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Raphaël Dos Santos MoraisEnvironmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Stefanie WienkoopDepartment for Molecular Systems Biology, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
Kjell SergeantEnvironmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Stanley LuttsGroupe de Recherche en Physiologie Végétale, Earth and Life Institute Agronomy, Universiteì catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Jean-Francois HausmanEnvironmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Jenny RenautEnvironmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LUUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell wall proteins were extracted from alfalfa stems according to a three-steps extraction procedure using sequentially CaCl2, EGTA, and LiCl-complemented buffers. The efficiency of this protocol for extracting cell wall proteins was compared with the two previously published methods optimized for alfalfa stem cell wall protein analysis. Following LC-MS/MS analysis the three-steps extraction procedure resulted in the identification of the highest number of cell wall proteins (242 NCBInr identifiers) and gave the lowest percentage of non-cell wall proteins (about 30%). However, the three protocols are rather complementary than substitutive since 43% of the identified proteins were specific to one protocol. This three-step protocol was therefore selected for a more detailed proteomic characterization using 2D-gel electrophoresis. With this technique, 75% of the identified proteins were shown to be fraction-specific and 72.7% were predicted as belonging to the cell wall compartment. Although, being less sensitive than LC-MS/MS approaches in detecting and identifying low-abundant proteins, gel-based approaches are valuable tools for the differentiation and relative quantification of protein isoforms and/or modified proteins. In particular isoforms, having variations in their amino-acid sequence and/or carrying different N-linked glycan chains were detected and characterized. This study highlights how the extracting protocols as well as the analytical techniques devoted to the study of the plant cell wall proteome are complementary and how they may be combined to elucidate the dynamism of the plant cell wall proteome in biological studies. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD001927.

Indexed as

cell wallEGTAglycosylationplantproteomics

Identifiers

PMID25914713
PMCPMC4392696
OpenAlexW2039625309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.