ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015
Genetic control of flowering time in legumes.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
103 citing papers in PubMed, 223 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the CO-FT regulatory module: E1 and PHYA emerge as players in photoperiodic regulation of flowering in legumes.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Integrating genomics, multi-omics, CRISPR and speed breeding for stress-resilient vegetable legume improvement.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Genetic interactions among flowering loci influence phenology, vigour, and yield in chickpea.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Trait Association for Flowering Time in Lentil from Global Multi-Environment Data Using GWAS and Machine Learning.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of ethyl methane sulfonate mutagenesis on phenological, yield-related and yield traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp).PloS one · 2026Article
- Genetic mapping of time-to-maturity trait in hypogaea x fastigiata peanut background reveals a significant effect of pod-related and flowering pattern.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Time to flowering and flowering duration in mungbean are unrelated physiological traits with independent genetic controls.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
- Comprehensive identification of the PEBP gene family in Vicia faba highlighting VfTFL1a variation and phenotypic insights into determinate growth.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the multifaceted dynamics of flowering time regulation in field crops: Insight and intervention approaches.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Arabidopsis as a model for translational research.The Plant cell · 2025Review
- Natural Variations in Key Maturity Genes Underpin Soybean Cultivars Adaptation Beyond 50° N in Northeast China.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Assisted Gene Flow Management to Climate Change in the Annual LegumeEvolutionary applications · 2025Article
- A population genomics approach to unlock the genetic potential of lablab (Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet), an underutilized tropical forage crop.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Comparative study of seed germination, phenology, and reproductive fitness in Melilotus sulcatus populations from Israel.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Local haplotyping reveals insights into the genetic control of flowering time variation in wild and domesticated soybean.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Delineation of loci governing an extra-earliness trait in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) using the QTL-Seq approach.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Phenotypic and genetic characterization of a near-isogenic line pair: insights into flowering time in chickpea.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timing of flowering, and in particular the degree to which it is responsive to the environment, is a key factor in the adaptation of a given species to various eco-geographic locations and agricultural practices. Flowering time variation has been documented in many crop legumes, and selection for specific variants has permitted significant expansion and improvement in cultivation, from prehistoric times to the present day. Recent advances in legume genomics have accelerated the process of gene identification and functional analysis, and opened up new prospects for a molecular understanding of flowering time adaptation in this important crop group. Within the legumes, two species have been prominent in flowering time studies; the vernalization-responsive long-day species pea (Pisum sativum) and the warm-season short-day plant soybean (Glycine max). Analysis of flowering in these species is now being complemented by reverse genetics capabilities in the model legumes Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus, and the emergence of genome-scale resources in a range of other legumes. This review will outline the insights gained from detailed forward genetic analysis of flowering time in pea and soybean, highlighting the importance of light perception, the circadian clock and the FT family of flowering integrators. It discusses the current state of knowledge on genetic mechanisms for photoperiod and vernalization response, and concludes with a broader discussion of flowering time adaptation across legumes generally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.