ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2015
Patient preferences in severe COPD and asthma: a comprehensive literature review.
Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of maternity models of care.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.The patient · 2022Pooled it
- Biomaterials mediated 3R (remove-remodel-repair) strategy: holistic management of Helicobacter pylori infection.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Role of compliance in Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: Results of the European Registry on H. pylori management.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- The modified Medical Research Council scale misclassifies exertional breathlessness among people referred for exercise testing.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Sociodemographic factors associated with time to discharge for hospitalised patients with asthma and asthma exacerbation using the Ghana Health Service District Information Management System 2 (DHIMS-2) database, 2012-2017.BMJ open respiratory research · 2021Article
- Prioritization and Refinement of Patient-Informed Value Elements as Attributes for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Preferences.The patient · 2021Article
- Perceptions and experiences of a manual therapy trial: a qualitative study of people with moderate to severe COPD.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2021Article
- A Two-Pronged Pulmonary Gene Delivery Strategy: A Surface-Modified Fullerene Nanoparticle and a Hypotonic Vehicle.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021Article
- Preferences of patients with asthma or COPD for treatments in pulmonary rehabilitation.Health economics review · 2021Article
- Article
- An overview of the common methods used to measure treatment adherence.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2019Review
- Healthcare Professionals' Preferred Efficacy Endpoints and Minimal Clinically Important Differences in the Assessment of New Medicines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- "A palliative end-stage COPD patient does not exist": a qualitative study of barriers to and facilitators for early integration of palliative home care for end-stage COPD.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2018Article
- Article
- Methods to perform systematic reviews of patient preferences: a literature survey.BMC medical research methodology · 2017Article
- The epidemiology of noncommunicable respiratory disease in sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and North Africa.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2017Review
- Practical considerations when prescribing a long-acting muscarinic antagonist for patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of chronic incurable diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma is difficult. Incorporation of patient preferences is widely encouraged. PURPOSE: To summarize original research articles determining patient preference in moderate-to-severe disease.
methodsAcceptable articles consisted of original research determining preferences for any aspect of care in patients with COPD/asthma. The target population included those with severe disease; however, articles were accepted if they separated outcomes by severity or if the majority had at least moderate-to-severe disease. We also accepted simulation research based on scenarios describing situations involving moderate-to-severe disease that elicited preferences. Two reviewers searched Medline and Embase for articles published from the date of inception of the databases until the end of November 2014, with differences resolved through consensus discussion. Data were tabulated and analyzed descriptively.
resultsAbout 478 articles identified, 448 were rejected and 30 analyzed. There were 25 on COPD and five on asthma. Themes identified as most important in COPD were symptom relief (dyspnea/breathlessness), a positive patient-physician relationship, quality-of-life impairments, and information availability. Patients strongly preferred sponsors' inhalers. At end-of-life, 69% preferred receiving CPR, 70% wanted noninvasive, and 58% invasive mechanical intervention. While patients with asthma preferred treatments that increased symptom-free days, they were willing to trade days without symptoms for a reduction in adverse events and greater convenience. Asthma patients were willing to pay for waking up once and not needing their inhaler over waking up once overnight and needing their inhaler.
conclusionFew studies have examined patient preference in these diseases. More research is needed to fill in knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.