Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25914518›Full record

ArticleProceedings of IEEE Southeastcon. IEEE Southeastcon2014

Evaluation of Semi-supervised Learning for Classification of Protein Crystallization Imagery.

Madhav Sigdel, İmren Dinç, Semih Dinç, Madhu S Sigdel, Marc L Pusey, Ramazan S Aygün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon. IEEE Southeastcon, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madhav SigdelDataMedia Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States.
İmren DinçDataMedia Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States.
Semih DinçDataMedia Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States.
Madhu S SigdelDataMedia Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States.
Marc L PuseyiXpressGenes, Inc., 601 Genome Way, Huntsville, Alabama 35806, United States.
Ramazan S AygünDataMedia Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States.

Funding

Fluorescence Intensity-based Scoring of Macromolecule Crystallization PlatesR42GM090453 · NIGMS · IXPRESSGENES, INC. · PI PUSEY, MARC LEE · 2013 to 2014
$744k
Fluorescence Intensity-Based Scoring of Macromolecule Crystallization PlatesR41GM090453 · NIGMS · IXPRESSGENES, INC. · PI PUSEY, MARC LEE · 2010 to 2010
$100k
NIGMS NIH HHS R41 GM090453NIGMS NIH HHS R42 GM090453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the performance of two wrapper methods for semi-supervised learning algorithms for classification of protein crystallization images with limited labeled images. Firstly, we evaluate the performance of semi-supervised approach using self-training with naïve Bayesian (NB) and sequential minimum optimization (SMO) as the base classifiers. The confidence values returned by these classifiers are used to select high confident predictions to be used for self-training. Secondly, we analyze the performance of Yet Another Two Stage Idea (YATSI) semi-supervised learning using NB, SMO, multilayer perceptron (MLP), J48 and random forest (RF) classifiers. These results are compared with the basic supervised learning using the same training sets. We perform our experiments on a dataset consisting of 2250 protein crystallization images for different proportions of training and test data. Our results indicate that NB and SMO using both self-training and YATSI semi-supervised approaches improve accuracies with respect to supervised learning. On the other hand, MLP, J48 and RF perform better using basic supervised learning. Overall, random forest classifier yields the best accuracy with supervised learning for our dataset.

Indexed as

image classificationprotein crystallizationself-trainingsemi-supervised learningYATSI

Identifiers

PMID25914518
PMCPMC4409002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.