Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25914241›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular biochemistry2015

Notch signaling promotes osteoclast maturation and resorptive activity.

Jason W Ashley, Jaimo Ahn, Kurt D Hankenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Myeloid-Specific Deletion ofBiomedicines · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Adhesion molecules in multiple myeloma oncogenesis and targeted therapy.International journal of hematologic oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason W AshleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jaimo AhnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kurt D HankensonDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

Funding

University of Pennsylvania Postdoctoral Opportunities in Research and TeachingK12GM081259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Janis K. Burkhardt · 2007 to 2026
$20.1M
The Role of Hyaluronic Acid Receptors in Tendon HealingP30AR050950 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WEHRLI, FELIX W · 2006 to 2015
$6.2M
Role of Notch signaling in fracture healing as a function of agingR03AG040670 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AHN, JAIMO, HANKENSON, KURT DAVID · 2011 to 2012
$160k
NIAMS NIH HHS 5 P30 AR050950-09NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR050950NIA NIH HHS R03 AG040670NIGMS NIH HHS 5K12 GM081259-08NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM081259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of Notch signaling in osteoclast differentiation is controversial with conflicting experimental evidence indicating both stimulatory and inhibitory roles. Differences in experimental protocols and in vivo versus in vitro models may explain the discrepancies between studies. In this study, we investigated cell autonomous roles of Notch signaling in osteoclast differentiation and function by altering Notch signaling during osteoclast differentiation using stimulation with immobilized ligands Jagged1 or Delta-like1 or by suppression with γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT or transcriptional inhibitor SAHM1. Stimulation of Notch signaling in committed osteoclast precursors resulted in larger osteoclasts with a greater number of nuclei and resorptive activity whereas suppression resulted in smaller osteoclasts with fewer nuclei and suppressed resorptive activity. Conversely, stimulation of Notch signaling in osteoclast precursors prior to induction of osteoclastogenesis resulted in fewer osteoclasts. Our data support a mechanism of context-specific Notch signaling effects wherein Notch stimulation inhibits commitment to osteoclast differentiation, but enhances the maturation and function of committed precursors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone ResorptionCalcium-Binding ProteinsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationDipeptidesImmobilized ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsJagged-1 ProteinMembrane ProteinsMiceOsteoclastsReceptors, NotchSerrate-Jagged ProteinsSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsCalcium-Binding ProteinsDipeptidesImmobilized ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsJag1 protein, mouseJagged-1 ProteinMembrane ProteinsN-(N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl)alanyl)phenylglycine tert-butyl esterReceptors, NotchSerrate-Jagged ProteinsTranscription FactorsBone resorptionNotch signalingOsteoclast commitmentOsteoclast fusionOsteoclasts

Identifiers

PMID25914241
PMCPMC4565736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.