Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25914082›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration2015

The role of adherens junctions in the developing neocortex.

Adam M Stocker, Anjen Chenn

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Adherens Junctions: Guardians of Cortical Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neural Progenitor Cell Polarity and Cortical Development.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam M Stockera Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory ; The Salk Institute ; La Jolla , CA USA.
Anjen Chenn
Illinois College · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The disproportional enlargement of the neocortex through evolution has been instrumental in the success of vertebrates, in particular mammals. The neocortex is a multilayered sheet of neurons generated from a simple proliferative neuroepithelium through a myriad of mechanisms with substantial evolutionary conservation. This developing neuroepithelium is populated by progenitors that can generate additional progenitors as well as post-mitotic neurons. Subtle alterations in the production of progenitors vs. differentiated cells during development can result in dramatic differences in neocortical size. This review article will examine how cadherin adhesion proteins, in particular α-catenin and N-cadherin, function in regulating the neural progenitor microenvironment, cell proliferation, and differentiation in cortical development.

Indexed as

Adherens Junctionsalpha CateninAnimalsbeta CateninCadherinsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCellular MicroenvironmentHumansMiceNeocortexNeuronsSignal Transductionalpha Cateninbeta CateninCadherinsadherens junctionAPC, Adenomatous polyposis coli.CBD, catenin binding domainCK1, Casein kinase 1differentiationGSK3β, glycogen synthase kinase 3βHh, HedgehogJMD, juxtamembrane domainN-cadherinPCP, planar cell polarityPI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinaseproliferationPTEN, phosphatase and tensin homologSHH, sonic hedgehogSNP, short neural precursorVZ, ventricular zonewntα-cateninβ-catenin

Identifiers

PMID25914082
PMCPMC4594481
OpenAlexW1504640523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.