ArticleTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology2015
The Efficacy and Safety of Procedural Sedoanalgesia with Midazolam and Ketamine in Pediatric Hematology.
Article in Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refractory symptoms in paediatric palliative care: can ketamine help?Drugs in context · 2021Review
- The comparison of the effects of ketamine and etomidate on cardiodynamics, biochemical and oxidative stress parameters in Wistar male rats.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2020Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Pediatric Oncology Patients.Cureus · 2020Article
- Comparison of Propofol and Ketamine Combination (Ketofol) and Propofol and Fentanyl Combination (Fenofol) on Quality of Sedation and Analgesia in the Lumpectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Advanced biomedical research · 2018Article
- Article
- Dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam-ketamine for sedation during awake fiberoptic nasal intubation in patients with difficult airway - A randomized, double-blinded, comparative trial.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of sedoanalgesia performed outside the operating room by pediatricians trained in advanced airway management and life support. MATERIALS AND
methodsMidazolam and ketamine were administered consecutively by intravenous route under cardiorespiratory monitoring for painful procedures of pediatric hematology.
resultsA total of 115 patients had 237 sedoanalgesia sessions. Sedation time was 24.02±23.37 s and sedation success was 92.5% (Ramsay scores of ≥5). Patient satisfaction was high. The recovery time was 28.81±14.4 min. Although statistically significant (p<0.01) increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate were observed without clinical importance, they improved without any intervention. No severe adverse events were observed.
conclusionSedoanalgesia with intravenous midazolam and ketamine for pediatric hematology and oncology patients' painful minor invasive procedures performed in an optimally equipped setting outside the operating room by pediatricians trained and certificated in advanced airway management and life support is effective and safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.