ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2015
The distribution of fitness effects in an uncertain world.
Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The distribution of fitness effects during adaptive walks using a simple genetic network.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Carry-over effects and fitness trade-offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Article
- Fluctuating Environments Maintain Genetic Diversity through Neutral Fitness Effects and Balancing Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Greater strength of selection and higher proportion of beneficial amino acid changing mutations in humans compared with mice andGenome research · 2021Article
- Article
- Long-term evolutionary conflict, Sisyphean arms races, and power in Fisher's geometric model.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- Quantifying natural seasonal variation in mutation parameters with mutation accumulation lines.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Determinants of the Efficacy of Natural Selection on Coding and Noncoding Variability in Two Passerine Species.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Evolved genetic and phenotypic differences due to mitochondrial-nuclear interactions.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) among new mutations plays a critical role in adaptive evolution and the maintenance of genetic variation. Although fitness landscape models predict several key features of the DFE, most theory to date focuses on predictable environmental conditions, while ignoring stochastic environmental fluctuations that feature prominently in the ecology of many organisms. Here, we derive an extension of Fisher's geometric model that incorporates two common effects of environmental variation: (1) nonadaptive genotype-by-environment interactions (G × E), in which the phenotype of a given genotype varies across environmental contexts; and (2) random fluctuation of the fitness optimum, which generates fluctuating selection. We show that both factors cause a mismatch between the DFE within single generations and the distribution of geometric mean fitness effects (averaged over multiple generations) that governs long-term evolutionary change. Such mismatches permit strong evolutionary constraints-despite an abundance of beneficial fitness variation within single environmental contexts-and to conflicting DFE estimates from direct versus indirect inference methods. Finally, our results suggest an intriguing parallel between the genetics and ecology of evolutionary constraints, with environmental fluctuations and pleiotropy placing qualitatively similar limits on the availability of adaptive genetic variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.