Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25913126›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2015

Genomic ancestry and ethnoracial self-classification based on 5,871 community-dwelling Brazilians (The Epigen Initiative).

M Fernanda Lima-Costa, Laura C Rodrigues, Maurício L Barreto, Mateus Gouveia, Bernardo L Horta, Juliana Mambrini, Fernanda S G Kehdy, Alexandre Pereira, Fernanda Rodrigues-Soares, Cesar G Victora and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

M Fernanda Lima-CostaFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto de Pesquisas Rene Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Laura C RodriguesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London, UK.
Maurício L BarretoUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Salvador, Brazil.
Mateus GouveiaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bernardo L HortaUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Programa de Pós Graduação em Epidemiologia, Pelotas, Brazil.
Juliana MambriniFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto de Pesquisas Rene Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fernanda S G KehdyUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alexandre PereiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Rodrigues-SoaresUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Programa de Pós Graduação em Epidemiologia, Pelotas, Brazil.
Eduardo Tarazona-SantosUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Epigen-Brazil group
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazil never had segregation laws defining membership of an ethnoracial group. Thus, the composition of the Brazilian population is mixed, and its ethnoracial classification is complex. Previous studies showed conflicting results on the correlation between genome ancestry and ethnoracial classification in Brazilians. We used 370,539 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms to quantify this correlation in 5,851 community-dwelling individuals in the South (Pelotas), Southeast (Bambui) and Northeast (Salvador) Brazil. European ancestry was predominant in Pelotas and Bambui (median = 85.3% and 83.8%, respectively). African ancestry was highest in Salvador (median = 50.5%). The strength of the association between the phenotype and median proportion of African ancestry varied largely across populations, with pseudo R(2) values of 0.50 in Pelotas, 0.22 in Bambui and 0.13 in Salvador. The continuous proportion of African genomic ancestry showed a significant S-shape positive association with self-reported Blacks in the three sites, and the reverse trend was found for self reported Whites, with most consistent classifications in the extremes of the high and low proportion of African ancestry. In self-classified Mixed individuals, the predicted probability of having African ancestry was bell-shaped. Our results support the view that ethnoracial self-classification is affected by both genome ancestry and non-biological factors.

Indexed as

AdultBlack PeopleBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEpigenEthnicityGenetics, PopulationGenomicsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhite PeopleEpigen

Identifiers

PMID25913126
PMCPMC5386196
OpenAlexW2090431676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.