Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25912929›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug safety2015

Everolimus and sirolimus in transplantation-related but different.

Jost Klawitter, Björn Nashan, Uwe Christians

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07234760 (ex Vivo Study of Liposomes Loaded With Everolimus in Chronic Lung Allograft Disfunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07234760 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

ex Vivo Study of Liposomes Loaded With Everolimus in Chronic Lung Allograft Disfunction

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled19ConditionsBronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS)ArmsLiposomes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pharmacology of Aging:Aging biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jost KlawitterUniversity of Colorado, iC42 Clinical Research and Development , Anschutz Medical Campus, 1999 North Fitzsimons Parkway, Suite 100, Aurora, CO 80045-7503 , USA +1 303 724 5665 ; +1 303 724 5662 ; uwe.christians@ucdenver.edu.
Björn Nashan
Uwe Christians
Weatherford College · USUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

In Vivo Assessment of Calcineurin Inhibitor Toxicity in ChildrenR01HD070511 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CHRISTIANS, UWE, THURMAN, JOSHUA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070511NICHD NIH HHS R01HD70511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) sirolimus and everolimus are used not only as immunosuppressants after organ transplantation in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) but also as proliferation signal inhibitors coated on drug-eluting stents and in cancer therapy. Notwithstanding their related chemical structures, both have distinct pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicodynamic properties. AREAS COVERED: The additional hydroxyethyl group at the C(40) of the everolimus molecule results in different tissue and subcellular distribution, different affinities to active drug transporters and drug-metabolizing enzymes as well as differences in drug-target protein interactions including a much higher potency in terms of interacting with the mTOR complex 2 than sirolimus. Said mechanistic differences as well as differences found in clinical trials in transplant patients are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: In comparison to sirolimus, everolimus has higher bioavailability, a shorter terminal half-life, different blood metabolite patterns, the potential to antagonize the negative effects of CNIs on neuronal and kidney cell metabolism (which sirolimus enhances), the ability to stimulate mitochondrial oxidation (which sirolimus inhibits) and to reduce vascular inflammation to a greater extent. A head-to-head, randomized trial comparing the safety and tolerability of these two mTOR inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients is merited.

Indexed as

EverolimusMultiprotein ComplexesSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesBiological AvailabilityGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2MitochondriaNeuronsEverolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2Multiprotein ComplexesSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine Kinasescomparisondrug metabolismeverolimusmammalian target of rapamycin complex 2mitochondrianephrotoxicityneuronal metabolismpharmacokineticssirolimusvascular inflammation

Identifiers

PMID25912929
PMCPMC6053318
OpenAlexW2099073545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.