Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25912883›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2015

Motor primitives--new data and future questions.

Simon F Giszter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Action-type mapping principles extend beyond evolutionarily conserved actions, even in people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biomechanical models in the lower-limb exoskeletons development: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Simon F GiszterNeurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19129 USA. Electronic address: sgiszter@drexelmed.edu.

Funding

Multielectrode recording in spinal cord during locomotion and rehabilitation afteR01NS072651 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI GISZTER, SIMON F · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Neurorobotics, modularity and function in SCI and Normal RatsR01NS054894 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI GISZTER, SIMON F · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Force-Field Control in Frog Motor BehaviorR01NS040412 · NINDS · MCP HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY · PI GISZTER, SIMON F · 2001 to 2005
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS NS054894NINDS NIH HHS NS072651NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040412NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054894NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor primitives allow integration across scales in the motor system and may link movement construction and circuit organization. This review examines support for primitives, and new data relating primitives to concrete circuit elements across species. Both kinematic motor primitives and muscle synergy/kinetic motor primitives are reviewed. Motor primitives allow a modular hierarchy that may be re-used by volitional systems in novel ways. They can provide a developmental bootstrap for ethologically important actions. Collections of primitives somewhat constrain motor acts, but at the same time sets of primitives facilitate the rapid construction of these constrained actions, and can allow use of simpler controls. Novel motor skill likely requires augmentation to transcend the constraints present in initial collections of low level motor primitives. The benefits and limitations of motor primitives and the recognized knowledge gaps and needs for future research are briefly discussed.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBrainHumansMovementMuscle, SkeletalPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID25912883
PMCPMC6524953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.