Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25912192›Full record

Trial reportBipolar disorders2015

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and nicotine patch for smokers with bipolar disorder: preliminary evaluation of in-person and telephone-delivered treatment.

Jaimee L Heffner, Jennifer B McClure, Kristin E Mull, Robert M Anthenelli, Jonathan B Bricker

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bipolar disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Web-Delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Smokefree.gov for Smokers With Bipolar Disorder.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jaimee L HeffnerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jennifer B McClureGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kristin E MullDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert M AnthenelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jonathan B BrickerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Targeted Intervention for Bipolar SmokersK23DA026517 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEFFNER, JAIMEE · 2009 to 2013
$654k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA026517NIDA NIH HHS K23DA026517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeople with bipolar disorder are two to three times more likely to smoke and 50% less likely to quit than the general population. New treatments are needed to improve smoking cessation outcomes in this group. The study aim was to develop and pilot test a novel cessation intervention for smokers with bipolar disorder using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) combined with nicotine patches.

methodsThe ten-session ACT intervention was initially evaluated as in-person, individual counseling (n = 10), then as telephone-delivered counseling (n = 6). Participants were adult smokers with no more than mild current symptoms of bipolar disorder.

resultsFor the in-person protocol, end-of-treatment outcomes were: 80% retention, 40% of participants with carbon monoxide (CO)-verified seven-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA), 90% satisfied with treatment, 8.3 of ten sessions attended, and 54% increase in acceptance of cravings to smoke (i.e., ACT's theory-based change process) from baseline. The seven-day PPA at one-month follow-up was 30%. For the telephone protocol, end-of-treatment outcomes were: 67% retention, 33% reporting seven-day PPA, 100% satisfied with treatment, 6.7 of ten treatment calls completed, and 55% increase in acceptance from baseline. At one-month follow-up, seven-day PPA was 17%. The proportion of treatment completers who used at least 80% of the nicotine patches was 62.5% for the in-person protocol and 0% for the telephone protocol.

conclusionsBoth in-person and telephone-delivered ACT were feasible. Despite low adherence to nicotine patches, the intervention showed preliminary evidence of facilitating quitting and impacting ACT's change mechanism. A randomized, controlled trial of this targeted ACT intervention is now needed.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyBipolar DisorderSmokingSmoking CessationTelephoneTobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsTobacco Use DisorderTreatment Outcomedepressionmanianicotinesmoking cessationtobacco

Identifiers

PMID25912192
PMCPMC4526426
OpenAlexW2159604744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.