Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25912016›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Behavioural correlates of combinatorial versus temporal features of odour codes.

Debajit Saha, Chao Li, Steven Peterson, William Padovano, Nalin Katta, Baranidharan Raman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Conserved neural dynamics and computations across species in olfaction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Invariant odor recognition with ON-OFF neural ensembles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Two Olfactory Pathways to Detect Aldehydes on Locust Mouthpart.International journal of biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  14. The I/O transform of a chemical sensor.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Debajit SahaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Chao LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Steven PetersonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
William PadovanoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Nalin KattaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Baranidharan RamanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.ORCID 000000027866155X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most sensory stimuli evoke spiking responses that are distributed across neurons and are temporally structured. Whether the temporal structure of ensemble activity is modulated to facilitate different neural computations is not known. Here, we investigated this issue in the insect olfactory system. We found that an odourant can generate synchronous or asynchronous spiking activity across a neural ensemble in the antennal lobe circuit depending on its relative novelty with respect to a preceding stimulus. Regardless of variations in temporal spiking patterns, the activated combinations of neurons robustly represented stimulus identity. Consistent with this interpretation, locusts reliably recognized both solitary and sequential introductions of trained odourants in a quantitative behavioural assay. However, predictable behavioural responses across locusts were observed only to novel stimuli that evoked synchronized spiking patterns across neural ensembles. Hence, our results indicate that the combinatorial ensemble response encodes for stimulus identity, whereas the temporal structure of the ensemble response selectively emphasizes novel stimuli.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalGrasshoppersMushroom BodiesNeuronsOlfactory PerceptionRandom AllocationSmell

Identifiers

PMID25912016
PMCPMC4421803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.