Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911673›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Tailoring of alerts substantially reduces the alert burden in computerized clinical decision support for drugs that should be avoided in patients with renal disease.

David Czock, Michael Konias, Hanna M Seidling, Jens Kaltschmidt, Vedat Schwenger, Martin Zeier, Walter E Haefeli

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic Alerts for Acute Kidney Injury.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lower alert rates by clustering of related drug interaction alerts.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David CzockDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany david.czock@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Michael KoniasDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hanna M SeidlingDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jens KaltschmidtDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Vedat SchwengerDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin ZeierDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Walter E HaefeliDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveElectronic alerts are often ignored by physicians, which is partly due to the large number of unspecific alerts generated by decision support systems. The aim of the present study was to analyze critical drug prescriptions in a university-based nephrology clinic and to evaluate the effect of different alerting strategies on the alert burden.

methodsIn a prospective observational study, two advanced strategies to automatically generate alerts were applied when medication regimens were entered for discharge letters, outpatient clinic letters, and written prescriptions and compared to two basic reference strategies. Strategy A generated alerts whenever drug-specific information was available, whereas strategy B generated alerts only when the estimated glomerular filtration rate of a patient was below a drug-specific value. Strategies C and D included further patient characteristics and drug-specific information to generate even more specific alerts.

resultsOverall, 1012 medication regimens were entered during the observation period. The average number of alerts per drug preparation in medication regimens entered for letters was 0.28, 0.080, 0.019, and 0.011, when using strategy A, B, C, or D (P<0.001, for comparison between the strategies), leading to at least one alert in 87.5%, 39.3%, 13.5%, or 7.81 % of the regimens. Similar average numbers of alerts were observed for medication regimens entered for written prescriptions.

conclusionsThe prescription of potentially hazardous drugs is common in patients with renal impairment. Alerting strategies including patient and drug-specific information to generate more specific alerts have the potential to reduce the alert burden by more than 90 %.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedMedical Order Entry SystemsContraindicationsDrug TherapyGermanyGlomerular Filtration RateHospitals, UniversityHumansMedication ErrorsProspective StudiesRenal Insufficiencyclinical decision support systemscontraindicationsmedical order entry systemsrenal insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID25911673
PMCPMC11737648
OpenAlexW1906040389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.