Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911603›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2015

[Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

B S Craiovan, J Grifka, A Keshmiri, B Moser, M Wörner, T Renkawitz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B S CraiovanOrthopädische Klinik, Universität Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Deutschland, benjamin.craiovan@ukr.de.
J Grifka
A Keshmiri
B Moser
M Wörner
T Renkawitz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRevision total hip arthroplasty is of rising importance, with 35,000 procedures a year in Germany.

objectivesPrimary stability of the revision implant, reconstruction of the anatomical hip center, reconstruction of bone stock, and permanent secondary integration are the main priorities.

methodsCurrent literature and examples from our own experience are presented. RESULTS AND

conclusionsNovel developments from basic research and industrial partners extend the possibilities for treating affected patients. For an integrated therapy concept in implant selection criteria, such as situation and structure of the defect, combination with any remaining implants, causes of loosening and failure, implant allergy, and patient-specific parameters should be taken into consideration.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone ResorptionHip JointHumansJoint InstabilityProsthesis FittingRadiographyReoperation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.