Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911553›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2015

Rituximab maintenance for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma in first remission: results of the randomized NHL13 trial.

Ulrich Jaeger, Marek Trneny, Helen Melzer, Michael Praxmarer, Weerasak Nawarawong, Dina Ben Yehuda, David Goldstein, Bilijana Mihaljevic, Osman Ilhan, Veronika Ballova and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00400478 (A Multicentre, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment Versus Observation Alone in Patients With Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00400478 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicentre, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment Versus Observation Alone in Patients With Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma: NHL-13

TypeinterventionalSponsorArbeitsgemeinschaft medikamentoese TumortherapieRan2006 to 2013Enrolled683ConditionsDiffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Follicular NHL Grade 3bArmsRituximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Maintenance treatment and survival in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the immunochemotherapy era: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Genetic Profiling in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The Promise and the Challenge.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 16 institutions in 10 countries.

Ulrich JaegerMedical University of Vienna, Dept. of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria ulrich.jaeger@meduniwien.ac.at.
Marek TrnenyInstitute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 1st Dept. of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General Hospital, Czech Lymphoma Study Group, Praha, Czech Republic.
Helen MelzerMedical University of Vienna, Dept. of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Michael PraxmarerAssign Data Management and Biostatistics GmbH Assign Group, Innsbruck, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Weerasak NawarawongDept. of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Dina Ben YehudaDept. of Hematology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
David GoldsteinAustralasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group, East Melbourne, Australia.
Bilijana MihaljevicClinic for Hematology, Clinical Center Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Osman IlhanAnkara University School of Medicine, Dept. of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey.
Veronika BallovaNOU, Klenova Bratislava, Slovakia.
Michael HedenusDept. of Internal Medicine, Sundsvall Hospital, Sweden.
Liang-Tsai HsiaoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Dept. of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wing-Yan AuUniversity Medical Unit, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Sonja BurgstallerDept. of Internal Medicine IV, Wels-Grieskirchen Hospital, Wels, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Gerhard Weidinger1st Medical Dept., Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Felix Keil3rd Medical Dept., Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Christian DittrichLBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna, Kaiser Franz Josef-Spital, Vienna, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Cathrin SkrabsMedical University of Vienna, Dept. of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Anton KlinglerAssign Data Management and Biostatistics GmbH Assign Group, Innsbruck, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Andreas ChottInstitute of Pathology and Microbiology, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria.
Michael A Fridrik3rd Dept. of Medicine, AKH-Linz, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Richard GreilDept. of Internal Medicine III, Private Medical University of Salzburg, Austria Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
AGMT-NHL13 Investigators
Medical University of Vienna · ATAnkara University · TRAustralasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group · AUCentar za Promociju Nauke · RSCharles University · CZChiang Mai University · THComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATHadassah Medical Center · ILHanusch Hospital · ATKaiser-Franz-Josef-Spital · ATKlinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · ATNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWQueen Mary Hospital · CNSundsvall Municipality · SEUniversity of Salzburg · ATWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=662) or follicular lymphoma grade 3b (n=21) in first complete remission. Patients were randomized to rituximab maintenance (n=338) or observation (n=345). At a median follow-up of 45 months, the event-free survival rate (the primary endpoint) at 3 years was 80.1% for rituximab maintenance versus 76.5% for observation. This difference was not statistically significant for the intent-to-treat population (likelihood ratio P=0.0670). The hazard ratio by treatment arm was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.57-1.08; P=0.1433). The secondary endpoint, progression-free survival was also not met for the whole statistical model (likelihood ratio P=0.3646). Of note, rituximab maintenance was superior to observation when treatment arms only were compared (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.90; P=0.0120). Overall survival remained unchanged (92.0 versus 90.3%). In subgroup analysis male patients benefited from rituximab maintenance with regards to both event-free survival (84.1% versus 74.4%) (hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.94; P=0.0267) and progression-free survival (89.0% versus 77.6%) (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.79; P=0.0058). Women had more grade 3/4 adverse events (P=0.0297) and infections (P=0.0341). Men with a low International Prognostic Index treated with rituximab had the best outcome. In summary, rituximab maintenance in first remission after R-CHOP-like treatment did not prolong event-free, progression-free or overall survival of patients with aggressive B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The significantly better outcome of men warrants further studies prior to the routine use of rituximab maintenance in men with low International Prognostic Index. This trial is registered under EUDRACT #2005-005187-90 and www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00400478.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisLymphoma, FollicularLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRituximabSex FactorsSurvival AnalysisRituximab

Identifiers

PMID25911553
PMCPMC4486230
OpenAlexW2147757009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.