Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911539›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2015

Systematic review of EASY-care needs assessment for community-dwelling older people.

Christopher Craig, Neil Chadborn, Gina Sands, Helena Tuomainen, John Gladman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Community Health Assessment Tools Adoptable in Nursing Practice: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Determinants of Quality of Life and the Need for Support for the Elderly with Good Physical and Mental Functioning.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Use of the electronic Frailty Index to identify vulnerable patients: a pilot study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher CraigNational Institute for Health Research, CLAHRC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Neil ChadbornNational Institute for Health Research, CLAHRC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Gina SandsNational Institute for Health Research, CLAHRC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Helena TuomainenWarwick Medical School, Division of Mental Health and Well-being, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
John GladmanNational Institute for Health Research, CLAHRC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundundertaking comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) combined with long-term health and social care management can improve the quality of life of older people [ 1]. The EASY-Care tool is a CGA instrument designed for assessing the physical, mental and social functioning and unmet health and social needs of older people in community settings or primary care. It has also been used as a frailty assessment tool and for gathering population-level data.

objectiveto review the evidence of reliability, validity and acceptability of EASY-Care and its appropriateness for assessing the needs of community-dwelling older people.

methodssystematic search of literature databases using pre-defined search terms (January 1994-May 2014) for English language articles reporting on the reliability, validity, acceptability and implementation of EASY-Care in primary care and community settings. Eligible articles were critically reviewed. Discussion papers mapping professionals' use of the tool were also included as these could be considered an aspect of validity.

resultstwenty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. A narrative synthesis was performed, because there was a variety of quantitative and qualitative outcomes and characteristics. Reliability evidence for EASY-Care is minimal. Evidence for validity is good, and it has received numerous positive endorsements of acceptability in international settings from older people and practitioners.

conclusionevidence supports the use of EASY-Care for individual needs assessment; further research is needed for other uses. Of the papers that made statements about who should administer EASY-Care, the majority indicated that nurses were preferable to self-completion.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overGeriatric AssessmentHumansNeeds AssessmentPrimary Health CareEASY-Caregeriatric assessmentneeds assessmentolder peoplesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID25911539
PMCPMC4476847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.