Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911483›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Efficient Genome Editing in Clostridium cellulolyticum via CRISPR-Cas9 Nickase.

Tao Xu, Yongchao Li, Zhou Shi, Christopher L Hemme, Yuan Li, Yonghua Zhu, Joy D Van Nostrand, Zhili He, Jizhong Zhou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic engineering inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CRISPR-Based Gene Editing inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Optimized De Novo Eriodictyol Biosynthesis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Tuning of Gene Expression inACS synthetic biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tao XuInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Yongchao LiInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Zhou ShiInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Christopher L HemmeInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Yuan LiInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Yonghua ZhuCollege of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Joy D Van NostrandInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Zhili HeInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Jizhong ZhouInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China jzhou@ou.edu.
University of Oklahoma · USHunan University · CNState Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system is a powerful and revolutionary genome-editing tool for eukaryotic genomes, but its use in bacterial genomes is very limited. Here, we investigated the use of the Streptococcus pyogenes CRISPR-Cas9 system in editing the genome of Clostridium cellulolyticum, a model microorganism for bioenergy research. Wild-type Cas9-induced double-strand breaks were lethal to C. cellulolyticum due to the minimal expression of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) components in this strain. To circumvent this lethality, Cas9 nickase was applied to develop a single-nick-triggered homologous recombination strategy, which allows precise one-step editing at intended genomic loci by transforming a single vector. This strategy has a high editing efficiency (>95%) even using short homologous arms (0.2 kb), is able to deliver foreign genes into the genome in a single step without a marker, enables precise editing even at two very similar target sites differing by two bases preceding the seed region, and has a very high target site density (median interval distance of 9 bp and 95.7% gene coverage in C. cellulolyticum). Together, these results establish a simple and robust methodology for genome editing in NHEJ-ineffective prokaryotes.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDeoxyribonuclease IGene TargetingGenetics, MicrobialHomologous RecombinationMolecular BiologyRuminiclostridium cellulolyticumStreptococcus pyogenesTransformation, BacterialDeoxyribonuclease I

Identifiers

PMID25911483
PMCPMC4475897
OpenAlexW2155208047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.