Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911439›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Excessive polypharmacy and survival in polypathological patients.

Jesús Díez-Manglano, Mercedes Giménez-López, Vanesa Garcés-Horna, María Sevil-Puras, Elena Castellar-Otín, Paloma González-García, Isabel Fiteni-Mera, Teresa Morlanes-Navarro, PLUPAR Study Researchers

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Polypharmacy in Nursing Home Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jesús Díez-ManglanoInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain. jdiez@aragon.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-2171
Mercedes Giménez-LópezGeriatrics Department, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Zaragoza, Spain.
Vanesa Garcés-HornaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain.
María Sevil-PurasInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain.
Elena Castellar-OtínInternal Medicine Department, Hospital de Barbastro, Huesca, Spain.
Paloma González-GarcíaGeriatrics Department, Hospital San José, Teruel, Spain.
Isabel Fiteni-MeraInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain.
Teresa Morlanes-NavarroGeriatrics Department, Hospital Nuestra Señora de Gracia, Zaragoza, Spain.
PLUPAR Study Researchers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine whether excessive polypharmacy is associated with a higher survival rate in polypathological patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsAn observational, prospective, and multicenter study was carried out on those polypathological patients admitted to the internal medicine and acute geriatrics departments between March 1 and June 30, 2011. For each patient, data concerning age, sex, comorbidity, Barthel and Lawton-Brody indexes, Pfeiffer's questionnaire, socio-familial Gijon scale, delirium, number of drugs, and number of admissions during the previous year were gathered, and the PROFUND index was calculated. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of ≥ 5 drugs and excessive polypharmacy as the use of ≥ 10. A 1-year long follow-up was carried out. A logistic regression model was performed to analyze the association of variables with excessive polypharmacy and a Cox proportional hazard model to determine the association between polypharmacy and survival.

resultsWe included 457 polypathological patients. Mean age was 81.0 (8.8) years and 54.5% were women. The mean number of drugs used was 8.2 (3.4). Excessive polypharmacy was directly associated with heart disease [hazard ratio (HR) 2.33 95% CI 1.40-3.87; p =0.001], respiratory disease [HR 1.87 95% CI 1.13-3.09; p = 0.01], peripheral artery disease/diabetes with retinopathy and/or neuropathy [HR 2.02 95% CI 1.17-3.50; p = 0.01], and the number of admissions during the previous year [HR 1.21 96%CI 1.01-1.44; p = 0.04]. It was inversely associated with delirium [HR 0.48 95% CI 0.25-0.91; p = 0.02]. There were no statistical differences regarding the probability of 1-year survival between patients with no polypharmacy, with simple polypharmacy, and with excessive polypharmacy (0.66, 0.60, and 0.57, respectively, p = 0.12).

conclusionsA greater use of drugs may not be harmful but is also not associated with a higher probability of survival in polypathological patients.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHospitalizationHumansInternal MedicineLogistic ModelsMalePolypharmacyPrescription DrugsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RatePrescription Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.